Europe

8484 readers

3 users here now

News/Interesting Stories/Beautiful Pictures from Europe 🇪🇺

(Current banner: Thunder mountain, Germany, 🇩🇪 ) Feel free to post submissions for banner pictures

Rules

(This list is obviously incomplete, but it will get expanded when necessary)

Be nice to each other (e.g. No direct insults against each other);
No racism, antisemitism, dehumanisation of minorities or glorification of National Socialism allowed;
No posts linking to mis-information funded by foreign states or billionaires.

Also check out !yurop@lemm.ee

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

poVoq@slrpnk.net

128

EU was ready to take away Hungarys veto rights if it had not conceded on issue of Ukraine accession talks (www.pravda.com.ua)

submitted 10 months ago by CAVOK@lemmy.world to c/europe@feddit.de

23 comments fedilink hide all child comments

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] misk@sopuli.xyz 8 points 10 months ago (6 children)

The source they're citing is a single person that's not likely to be impartial.

[–] letmesleep@feddit.de 13 points 10 months ago (5 children)

That doesn't change that the option is on the table and has been for years. It's it the EU's de-facto constitution:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Article_7_of_the_Treaty_on_European_Union

[–] Vincent@kbin.social 1 points 10 months ago

Identifying the breach requires unanimity (excluding the state concerned), but sanctions require only a qualified majority.

Wait, how does this work? Can sanctions be instated without identifying a country as being in breach? Or is unanimity first required, and only after that, the majority can decide what the sanction is?

load more comments (4 replies)