this post was submitted on 11 Oct 2025
705 points (99.7% liked)

Lord of the memes

11041 readers
230 users here now

The Lord of the rings memes communitiy on Lemmy. Share memes about Lord of the rings and be respectful.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Azzu@lemmy.dbzer0.com 13 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (2 children)

I still don't really understand this sentiment. Could you please explain why this is the case for you? I really mean this as curiosity.

I can certainly understand current things, like if there is a book author right now that is a piece of shit and they try to sell a new book, of course I won't buy it. Also not support their old stuff. But why exactly is their effect in the past tainted by this? LotR is still an amazing book, talking about lots of good things like friendship, loyalty, self-sacrifice etc, creating a beautifully interesting fantasy world. Why is this ruined, why can you not appreciate this now that you know the author is a piece of shit?

[–] notthebees@reddthat.com 38 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

For context, David and Leigh Eddings were convicted in the late 60s for child abuse in South Dakota. They literally put their adopted children in cages.

[–] Azzu@lemmy.dbzer0.com 18 points 1 week ago

Ok yeah then I completely missed everything :) thanks for the context

[–] vithigar@lemmy.ca 20 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I think they're talking about David and Leigh Eddings, authors of Belgarath the Sorcerer.

[–] Azzu@lemmy.dbzer0.com 9 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Didn't know that :) don't know that book then, thought I was just forgetting something about LotR. But my original question still stands.

[–] vithigar@lemmy.ca 19 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

Well, in this case it's a book that features small sexualized female creatures, which is already pretty ick, but then you put the fact that the Eddings' went to jail on multiple charges of "extensive physical child abuse" and that's a whole new layer of closely connected grossness.

It's one thing to accept death of the author when the material isn't related to whatever it is the author did. It's a bit more unsettling when the work seems like it was influenced by those same proclivities.

[–] Azzu@lemmy.dbzer0.com 5 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Understandable, thanks for the correction :) as I thought it was about LotR, my comment is basically completely irrelevant xD

[–] nomy@lemmy.zip 5 points 1 week ago

"You can lead a horse to water but you can't make them drink."