this post was submitted on 17 Dec 2023
311 points (77.3% liked)

Technology

59641 readers
3346 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] n3m37h@lemmy.world 26 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (1 children)

Starlink is trash too, come at me Elon

[–] themelm@sh.itjust.works 21 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Starlink is shitty and yet where I'm at its still easily the cheapest, fastest, and most reliable option. Infuriating really.

[–] n3m37h@lemmy.world 5 points 11 months ago (3 children)

Yeah, if he spent the money on laying fibre instead of using satilites that need to be replaced every at most 18 months and as little as 2 months, everyone would have been better off.

[–] themelm@sh.itjust.works 9 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Yeah and if my province hadn't sold of their public telephone company to private investors I'd be even more better off so I'm more pissed about that.

[–] n3m37h@lemmy.world 4 points 11 months ago

Gotta love when rich people convince our politicians that they can do the job better than the Govt and then we loose everything. Like when Brian M sold off CN Rail now Bill Gates is making billions from it.

[–] MrMcGasion@lemmy.world 5 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Yeah, but he only has the one digger, so the fiber would all end up in hyperloop-sized tunnels, it'd be like the Underminer from the Incredibles.

[–] n3m37h@lemmy.world 4 points 11 months ago

Prob would still be cheaper and more environmentally friendlier

[–] velxundussa@sh.itjust.works 3 points 11 months ago (1 children)

I see that being said quite often.

Is there any actual proof of this or is it speculation?

In low density population areas, it seems to me that laying fiber would be cost prohibitive, but I'd like to be proven wrong.

[–] n3m37h@lemmy.world 3 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

Each satellite is worth 250k @ 5,500 units currently (and its still garbage unless its your only option). And this is just the cost of satilites

Worse case scenario for laying fibre is $80,000 for 1 mile

You do the shit maths and that is 17,187.5 miles (not km) of fibre for what is currently in LEO and excluding the price of launching these POS into the nights sky. So for best case senario every 18 months that is how much fibre lines Elon could be laying.

From Presque Isles, Maine to Sandiego, California is 3,305 miles