Could be small or big.
My answer has always been that, Linux can't handle everything I'd ask out of it that I normally can with Windows. I know the games issue has been progressing far from the days when that used to have been an archaic flaw with Linux for the longest time. Games might not be the issue except for some concerns I have for some games.
I was taking some time a few moments ago, to check if a program called Firestorm Viewer would work on Linux Mint which could've been my distro of choice. And the description written on the linux page described exactly the kind of concerns I'd have for compatibility and usability from going Windows to Linux.
They said that their viewer was tested and designed to function mostly with Ubuntu and while it could work with other distros, it's not to be expected to be smooth.
That's the kind of sentiment and concern I have always had with Linux if I were to go from Windows to it. There are programs and tools on Windows that I have that are used for specific purposes and I know they will not function on Linux. Furthermore, incase anything breaks down, any and all solutions would only be applicable to that thing that would be far easier to solve than just being SOL if I was on Linux.
It is something as a user that I just can't simply afford to deal with on a regular basis if I made the switch.
So while I may not have too much of an issue running games, I won't have too much of an issue using alternatives, I won't have to deal with the Windows ecosystem .etc I will just be running into other walls that would simply make me second guess my decision and make me regret switching to the point where I would dip back into Windows in a hurry.
I have tried several times, with both Ubuntu and Mint, and it never ends well for me. I even use Ubuntu as a web server for years, and have similar problems there, just in a different use case. I don't even get to a point where I'm unable to run apps that can run on Windows. It always seems to work fine during the first few hours and while doing the setup and config stage, I eventually run into a never-ending troubleshooting wormhole that leads nowhere but aggravation. I'll spend hours upon hours scouring the internet for solutions and it always ends the same way "I have this same problem, and this fixed it." and whatever "this" was never fixes it for me, whatever it is. I feel like Linux is just so always evolving that there's no standards and a command that works for one user on a previous version/distro is just completely useless for me because of some obscure technical glitch or difference whatever my installation has. Dealing with repositories, updates and endless dependencies is always just impossible and it's completely alien to someone who's used Windows for 40 years.
My current iteration is I'm running a dual boot machine with Mint and Windows with the intention of phasing out Windows, but I'm unable to trust Linux Mint to be there when I need it. After a day or so of installing apps and configuration, it became unstable. I attempted to update the video drivers to the "recommended" version and it seems to have borked the whole Linux installation and nothing on the internet seems helpful, and the communities aren't very friendly to n00bs.
So I always end up back on Windows, even though my hateful soul wants to ditch it badly. As much as I hate Windows and MS, Windows rarely has severe stability issues.
Are you me!? What you described is exactly my experience with Linux. I really want to completely ditch Windows, but I'm not keen on the idea of spending full days of my life every year on maintaining a Linux installation. I tried Ubuntu, Manjaro and PopOS, all of which have bugs preventing audio from being played on my laptop (I spent so many hours troubleshooting and couldn't figure it out). Finally tried Mint and audio works most of the time, but Mint is a super mediocre experience that I'm not excited about and I don't understand why people rave about it. My laptop is dual boot and I use Mint 95% of the time but it's pretty lame and doesn't feel like "my" OS.
Linux enthusiasts scratching their heads wondering why the masses aren't switching over to Linux need to understand that it's nowhere near ready to go mainstream. Even after decades of development it takes more troubleshooting and customization than 95% of people are willing to give it.
Maybe you should try something Arch-based like Cachy OS? Coming from Mint I don't think I could live without the Arch wiki now. Just like you said, I was tired of the never ending obscure forums. I'm personally using EndeavourOS and everything just worksβ’οΈ. I'd like to think it's due to the fact that less things are pre-configured, so my configs are the singular source of truth. I would say Ubuntu based distros are not good for extensively modifying.
Again, thank you for the recommendation of CachyOS. I whipped it up last night on my computer, and other than a small blip that the drive doesn't appear in bootable devices on my BIOS unless I go deep digging and manually click it to boot, it's been very smooth and reliable. I've been using it all night/day and it is really nice. I just have to figure out why the drive doesn't appear in my boot order menu when it's clearly a bootable OS.
Glad to help!
If you're trying to use grub(im not sure which boot loader you're using), you'll need to add the drive ID to the boot config. You can use something like
lsblk -fI hope that's enough information to help you keep going.I second CachyOS. That shit just works on every machine I slap it on.