this post was submitted on 05 Oct 2025
249 points (100.0% liked)

Chapotraphouse

14157 readers
724 users here now

Banned? DM Wmill to appeal.

No anti-nautilism posts. See: Eco-fascism Primer

Slop posts go in c/slop. Don't post low-hanging fruit here.

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
 

average democrat senator btw

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[โ€“] Muinteoir_Saoirse@hexbear.net 2 points 4 weeks ago* (last edited 4 weeks ago) (1 children)

However this fails to address any type of intersectionality. Because white women sexually objectify men of colour as a historical weapon of oppression. Able-bodied people sexually objectify disabled men as a historical weapon of oppression. To say that sexually objectifying strangers is okay as long as they meet x-y-z criteria is absolutely ridiculous. Just poor taste misogyny masquerading as "feminism" because it's being done to men now. The same nonsense as girlboss feminism or whatever.

ALSO completely ignores that men can be (and are) victims of sexual harassment and assault, and you are potentially sexually objectifying someone who has survived such experiences. This also fuels the attitude that men are always perpetrators and thus cannot be victims, which makes a really toxic environment that alienates men who have been survivors who feel they are not taken seriously because they, as men, are inherently unable to be objectified and aggressed upon. Really icky behaviour to excuse with jokes

EDIT: and don't get me started on how inappropriate it would be to say shit like this about an asexual person who is sex averse

STOP OBJECTIFYING PEOPLE, it's chud behaviour no matter the reason or direction

[โ€“] CharlieTheOctopus@hexbear.net 1 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

ok, i stand corrected. thank you for taking the time to comment