this post was submitted on 16 Dec 2023
28 points (85.0% liked)

Privacy

31679 readers
314 users here now

A place to discuss privacy and freedom in the digital world.

Privacy has become a very important issue in modern society, with companies and governments constantly abusing their power, more and more people are waking up to the importance of digital privacy.

In this community everyone is welcome to post links and discuss topics related to privacy.

Some Rules

Related communities

Chat rooms

much thanks to @gary_host_laptop for the logo design :)

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 

From a privacy standpoint, i guess. I want to support open scrobbling with listenbrainz and the account isn't directly linked to a real acc. Why shouldn't I/ why don't you?

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] drkt@feddit.dk 20 points 10 months ago (3 children)

What threat model includes "malicious actor can see my taste in music"?

[–] sxan@midwest.social 32 points 10 months ago (2 children)

Social engineering. The more information they have about you, the easier you are to immitate.

The threat isn't in any one piece of information about you; it's in the corpus of knowledge, the profile they can build. Your tastes in music - at the granularity of not only what you listen to, but how much, and at what times - can help narrow down:

  • how old you are
  • where (in the world, and maybe to the time zone) you live
  • your mother tongue
  • probably your socio-economic status

These are just the things I can tyink of off the top of my head, and I'm not in infosec.

[–] drkt@feddit.dk 7 points 10 months ago (1 children)

They're gonna datamine way more than that on the fediverse but yeah sure.

[–] sxan@midwest.social 8 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (1 children)

Depends on how much you let them link it back to you, but you're absolutely right: social media is a privacy nightmare. It can be mitigated; pick a Lemmy instance that doesn't require an email, and don't give out any identifying information, or just lurk. Many of us have multiple accounts on different servers, with carefully segregated personas. You do what you can; OP asked why (or why not) scrob. I see no reason to give out that information, only to give a company more information they can sell.

[–] sibloure@beehaw.org 1 points 10 months ago

All of that info is already available for anyone who has a government ID or census record

[–] LWD@lemm.ee 9 points 10 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (2 children)
[–] drkt@feddit.dk 5 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Because music charts are valuable because the music industry is valuable? They give me free access to their API and they get to scrape the data. It's not incriminating data, it's not GPS data. It is, at best, an unreliable indicator of when I am awake.

[–] LWD@lemm.ee 6 points 10 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (1 children)
[–] Ilandar@aussie.zone 0 points 10 months ago

Those are pretty terrible examples.

[–] sbv@sh.itjust.works 3 points 10 months ago

They sell (sold?) the recommendation API. When you scrobble, last.fm got to build a corpus of data they could make recommendations from.

[–] angrystego@lemmy.world 7 points 10 months ago (2 children)

In totalitarian countries, those who listen to certain types of music are persecuted, because it links them with demografic that can be threatening to the regime. Even if your country is not totalitarian now, the existence of this data could be potentionally harmful to you in the future (just like any data, really).

[–] drkt@feddit.dk 8 points 10 months ago (1 children)

The day my government arrests me for listening to furry speedcore is the day I'll eat my socks, man

[–] angrystego@lemmy.world 3 points 10 months ago

Yeah, it's great to be safe in your country. I enjoy it too, fortunately. But it's not the same everywhere.

[–] loutr@sh.itjust.works 3 points 10 months ago

In quite a few countries some genres of music are actually illegal. Nazi music in France, most of western music in Iran, ...