this post was submitted on 02 Oct 2025
1367 points (99.1% liked)

Technology

75707 readers
3699 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] LadyAutumn@lemmy.blahaj.zone 11 points 19 hours ago (6 children)

Oh we are way passed the point where "voting with your dollar" means literally anything. These billionaires are making more money than they ever have in human history. They have literally turned all of society across large swaths of the world into a gigantic personal capital generator. It makes literally not a single difference if all of us here boycotted them or not. It's meaningless.

[–] the_q@lemmy.zip 16 points 19 hours ago (3 children)
[–] Soup@lemmy.world 9 points 18 hours ago (3 children)

A big problem is that people need smartphones for so much of modern life. You can stop watching Disney and your life won’t meaningfully change but it’s really hard to avoid evil smartphone companies. Part of me wants to switch from Apple but what would I go to? Samsung who’s just as bad about right to repair? Google who’s Google? I’m not saying it’s impossible but I’m not going to say that the choice is as easy as cancelling a streaming service.

[–] 0x0@lemmy.zip 2 points 13 hours ago (2 children)

A big problem is that people need smartphones for so much of modern life.

Do you though? They're convenient, for sure, but you can also use a dumbphone and a laptop.

[–] Soup@lemmy.world 2 points 10 hours ago* (last edited 10 hours ago) (1 children)

Yea, just gunna carry my laptop around with me everywhere. And that’s not even talking about all the nonsense on laptops that most people can’t deal with.

[–] 0x0@lemmy.zip 1 points 10 hours ago

Keyword: convenient

[–] LainTrain@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 12 hours ago* (last edited 11 hours ago) (1 children)

How the fuck would I access my bank then? All banks literally require their apps to access the account or sometimes even open the account, nevermind actually pay for anything or get a debit or credit card.

>Inb4 some American downvotes because they forget the rest of the world exists

We get it, Americans use cash in America, and they use magnetic stripe cards and cheques and all these other technologies that were phased out in rest of the world before I was even born, but that's not really an argument to make on a global platform.

[–] 0x0@lemmy.zip -1 points 11 hours ago (1 children)

All banks literally require

In your part of the world...

[–] LainTrain@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 11 hours ago* (last edited 11 hours ago)

In most of the world that isn't 1 country that starts with 'United States' and ends with 'of America'

[–] SaharaMaleikuhm@feddit.org 2 points 16 hours ago (1 children)

Fairphone. Right to repair, plus good custom ROM and linux on mobile support.

[–] LainTrain@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 12 hours ago (1 children)

Useless without passing Google's Integrity checks.

[–] DeathByBigSad@sh.itjust.works 1 points 10 minutes ago

Two phones.

One for everyday life.

The other for documentation of events, activism, direct action, this app mentioned in the post, and maybe even rebellions.

(actually if you are doing a rebellion, you better use meshtastic or some sort of radios, and remember: do not transmit from home)

[–] the_q@lemmy.zip -2 points 18 hours ago (3 children)

Yeah this is generally the take I hear the most. The smartphone is presented as a necessity and for a lot of people that may be true, but what it really is is a tool for capitalism. It spies on you, gives you fomo, serves you ads, gives access to all kinds of addictive content... oh and work apps!

It's like AI, shoved down our throats until people think it's needed. It's not.

[–] LainTrain@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 12 hours ago (1 children)

Yeah except I do actually need one for work, paying rent, paying bills etc. It's a helluva position of privilege to be able to say no to something like that, and that's coming from someone who doesn't have a car, which is far less necessary.

[–] the_q@lemmy.zip 1 points 9 hours ago

You can't do those things any other way, eh? That's crazy...

It's a privilege to say no, eh? Interesting take.

[–] Reverendender@sh.itjust.works 7 points 18 hours ago

Your smartphone serves you ads?

[–] Soup@lemmy.world 4 points 17 hours ago* (last edited 17 hours ago)

I would say you’re missing some nuance in these arguments, though.

With a phone people no longer need laptops or full-sized computers and they also get a phone and camera to go along with it. They get a lot of power even just using fairly mundane apps like email, file storage, and a calendar. And then you have access to the internet and all the power that comes with that. I also don’t know why you think phones show ads.

AI, on the other hand, is hot fucking garbage at everything it does. Why anyone uses it I can’t say, it’s so bad and it’s known that it’s actively making people dumber. I don’t touch the stuff and my life has been going just fine.

[–] nutsack@lemmy.dbzer0.com 5 points 19 hours ago (1 children)

they would have been perfectly fine it was simply that the optics were bad enough to warrant a response

[–] jfrnz@lemmy.world 2 points 18 hours ago

Why do they care about the optics? $$$

[–] LadyAutumn@lemmy.blahaj.zone 4 points 19 hours ago (1 children)

Do you really think this situation is comparable in any way to Jimmy Kimmel? I really don't. Even if it were, nowhere near that many Apple customers care whether or not the app that targets fascist militias is on the app store or not.

[–] the_q@lemmy.zip 3 points 19 hours ago (2 children)

I do think it's comparable. All of this is about money. Americans are funding all of this crap with the, albeit controlled, choices we make with our money. Our taxes are funding genocides and coups and war and destruction; our purchasing habits are funding the decline of our planet and our social structures and our sanity.

You're right though, consumers will likely never change in large enough quantities to make a real difference. People are already resubbing to Hulu so...

[–] 0x0@lemmy.zip 1 points 13 hours ago

Americans are funding all of this crap with the, albeit controlled, choices we make with our money.

To an extent, yes, but the dollar has been decoupled from gold a long time ago, they can literally just print money in the billions and they do (although there days it's probably money++ on a mainframe), completely sidestepping tax money..

[–] LadyAutumn@lemmy.blahaj.zone 5 points 18 hours ago* (last edited 18 hours ago)

Jimmy Kimmel made Disney a lot of money. They had to choose between pressure from the US government, and losing a popular source of revenue along with the vast amount of liberals who swore them off. Jimmy Kimmel was not a real institutional threat to the US government. So the US government did not have a very strong incentive to continuously push for him being taken down, and Disney had a lot of incentive to keep him around.

An app that targets fascists makes Apple no money. The US government faces the loss (or rendering ineffective) of their fascist police force. Both sides therefore face a huge amount of pressure to have the app taken down. It would have to be a gigantic part of their profit margin to warrant any pushback from Apple. I'd be very, very surprised to hear that this change is ever overturned through a boycott.

[–] jaemo@sh.itjust.works 11 points 17 hours ago

...and it happened in a vacuum, just all by itself.

[–] donalonzo@lemmy.world 11 points 18 hours ago (1 children)

Every revolution famously begins with everyone giving up completely.

[–] LadyAutumn@lemmy.blahaj.zone 3 points 18 hours ago (1 children)

Can you show me where I said to do nothing? Or is boycotting the only form of collective action you're aware of?

[–] donalonzo@lemmy.world -1 points 16 hours ago (1 children)

No, but great idea gatekeeping collective action. We surely need less of it.

[–] LadyAutumn@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 11 hours ago

I wasnt gatekeeping it. Just pointing out how ultimately ineffective it is in creating meaningful change.

[–] ILoveUnions@lemmy.world 6 points 16 hours ago (2 children)

It makes literally not a single difference if all of us here boycotted them or not. It's meaningless.

Just lemmy users? Sure, but you don't stop with just lemmy users.

These billionaires are making more money than they ever have in human history

Honest to god do you think that money magically appears in their pocket. We can still claw it back. Unionize, boycott, collective action is our strongest pressure against them and IT DOES WORK.

[–] LadyAutumn@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 9 hours ago

I agree that collective action is our strongest pressure against them and it does work.

I do not think a boycott itself is likely to reverse Apple's removal of the app. I also think it makes more sense for the app to become available from a web browser, or some other avenue that circumvents the need for Apple's approval in the first place.

I also believe that collective action in this circumstance is better spent on ICE itself, which would be more effective (its the reason the US government wants Apple to remove the app in the first place) and more direct to fascist power.

[–] 0x0@lemmy.zip 2 points 13 hours ago

collective action is our strongest pressure against them

Which is why governments fight so much to make it hard.
In my neck of the woods it's not cool to unionize and there's no home owners' association, people only rally for their favorite sports team but don't bother voting.

I guess we get what we deserve.

[–] drmoose@lemmy.world 7 points 19 hours ago (2 children)
[–] NauticalNoodle@lemmy.ml 5 points 18 hours ago

Every time I hear people talk like that I begin to think they dont understand basic microeconomics.

[–] LadyAutumn@lemmy.blahaj.zone 3 points 18 hours ago (1 children)

Yes, as opposed to spending money at another capitalist institution that will inevitably do the same thing, which is somehow not a subservient take.

There are a lot of other ways to apply pressure besides boycotts. I dont think a boycott would ever work against Apple over this.

[–] drmoose@lemmy.world -1 points 17 hours ago (1 children)

ah good ol Cynicism. Might as well find yourself a giant pot to live in while they're still available!

[–] LadyAutumn@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 11 hours ago (1 children)

I dont understand why recommending other forms of collective action makes me cynical.

[–] drmoose@lemmy.world 1 points 11 hours ago (1 children)
[–] LadyAutumn@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 points 11 hours ago (1 children)

There are a lot of other ways to apply pressure besides boycotts.

?

[–] drmoose@lemmy.world 2 points 10 hours ago (1 children)

are these other forms in the room with us?

[–] LadyAutumn@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 10 hours ago (1 children)

I'm not sure why you're taking such an aggressive / dismissive tone towards me. Did your comment really warrant a breakdown of possible forms of collective action? It never really seemed you were interested in a nuanced discussion in the first place.

I think collective action in this circumstance is better spent on directly obstructing ICE operations. The developers of the app would be better served by making their project accessible in browser, and self hosted so as to prevent further attempts to make it inaccessible. Group collective action should be focused on demonstration and obstruction of the root of the problem, ICE itself. How you go about the depends a lot on when/where but there are a lot of ways to obstruct their operations.

Ive never personally spent money on any kind of Apple device. I would certainly encourage others not to as well, a thing I was already doing. But I think focusing on Apple as the root problem here is a mistake in the first place.

[–] drmoose@lemmy.world 1 points 9 hours ago

Sorry dude just tired of this defeatism online and even if voting with your wallet doesn't work we never collectively manage to even test it. Just exhausting. Maybe youre right maybe it doesn't work and it's stupid but the bigger point is that people just don't put effort into it.

[–] ThunderQueen@lemmy.world 2 points 17 hours ago

Im sure thats why disney quickly reversed gear with cancelling kimmel after loosing 3.8B overnight