this post was submitted on 02 Oct 2025
654 points (98.8% liked)

Science Memes

16939 readers
4319 users here now

Welcome to c/science_memes @ Mander.xyz!

A place for majestic STEMLORD peacocking, as well as memes about the realities of working in a lab.



Rules

  1. Don't throw mud. Behave like an intellectual and remember the human.
  2. Keep it rooted (on topic).
  3. No spam.
  4. Infographics welcome, get schooled.

This is a science community. We use the Dawkins definition of meme.



Research Committee

Other Mander Communities

Science and Research

Biology and Life Sciences

Physical Sciences

Humanities and Social Sciences

Practical and Applied Sciences

Memes

Miscellaneous

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Wakmrow@hexbear.net 1 points 22 hours ago (1 children)

In this particular case it would still be infinite train proof people. But consider the infinite set of natural numbers. If the train killed only left handed people, you should still be left with infinite train proof right handed people. If, however you ran another train through the set that killed right handed people you would be left with no train proof people. In actual fact, though, the infinite set of "people killed by a train" is probably 100%.

[–] porous_grey_matter@lemmy.ml 1 points 22 hours ago (1 children)

If the train killed only left handed people, you should still be left with infinite train proof right handed people.

Well, infinite left-hand-killing-train proof people, we don't know about other trains.

[–] Wakmrow@hexbear.net 1 points 22 hours ago

While true, my point was that this is a thought experiment to show that subtracting infinite countable sets from infinite countable sets does not leave you necessarily with an infinite countable set.