this post was submitted on 01 Oct 2025
397 points (98.5% liked)

Science Memes

16939 readers
2735 users here now

Welcome to c/science_memes @ Mander.xyz!

A place for majestic STEMLORD peacocking, as well as memes about the realities of working in a lab.



Rules

  1. Don't throw mud. Behave like an intellectual and remember the human.
  2. Keep it rooted (on topic).
  3. No spam.
  4. Infographics welcome, get schooled.

This is a science community. We use the Dawkins definition of meme.



Research Committee

Other Mander Communities

Science and Research

Biology and Life Sciences

Physical Sciences

Humanities and Social Sciences

Practical and Applied Sciences

Memes

Miscellaneous

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] icelimit@lemmy.ml 4 points 1 day ago (2 children)

I understood some of these words

[–] Scubus@sh.itjust.works 1 points 21 hours ago (1 children)

My theory runs as follows:

Take two partcles, and measure the energy found in both if them and the space between them. It is my speculation that as they get closer, the energy in the space between them raises. It follows that with higher energy in a smaller area, the curvatureof spacetime would be warped, explaining the differance in expected values between quantum and relativity.

Basically im saying an oversight caused a math error.

I am not a quantum physicist and i only study it as a hobby, this is almost definitely not the actual solution

[–] icelimit@lemmy.ml 2 points 20 hours ago (1 children)

But energy is quantized. By your explanation, distance should also be quantized as a consequence.

Or distance might not be actually quantized, just that we can't place things in between like the pieces on a chess set.

[–] Scubus@sh.itjust.works 1 points 19 hours ago

Is distance not quantized? It was my understanding that the planc length was the "grid size" of the universal array, so to speak.

That being said, gravity as we detect it is not confirmed to be quantized, which is where the confusion comes in. That implies that there is a fundamental factor that is non quantized, possibly with other factors that may be quantized. What I'm getting at here is that while energy is definitely quantized, gravity may be a product of energy/distance, with distance being non quantized, resulting in non quantized gravity.

[–] HeyThisIsntTheYMCA@lemmy.world 1 points 23 hours ago

yeah, "can", "the", "and", this makes sense