this post was submitted on 02 Oct 2025
1369 points (98.0% liked)

Science Memes

16939 readers
4342 users here now

Welcome to c/science_memes @ Mander.xyz!

A place for majestic STEMLORD peacocking, as well as memes about the realities of working in a lab.



Rules

  1. Don't throw mud. Behave like an intellectual and remember the human.
  2. Keep it rooted (on topic).
  3. No spam.
  4. Infographics welcome, get schooled.

This is a science community. We use the Dawkins definition of meme.



Research Committee

Other Mander Communities

Science and Research

Biology and Life Sciences

Physical Sciences

Humanities and Social Sciences

Practical and Applied Sciences

Memes

Miscellaneous

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] brucethemoose@lemmy.world 11 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (3 children)

I think the flip side of this is Facebook or wherever the link was pushed to your in-laws (which is what I'd guess happened) feels... empowering. Those apps are literally optimized, with billions of dollars (and extensive science, especially psychology), to validate folk's views in the pursuit of keeping them clicking. Their world's telling them they're right; of course your retort will feel offensive and wrong.

They're in a trap.

And I still see lot of scientists posit 'why is this happening?' unironically on Twitter or something, which really frustrates me.

[–] psud@aussie.zone 6 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Every Facebook profile posted to /r/HermanCainAwards (the subreddit for mocking deluded people who died of COVID while spreading misinformation) was the same. Whatever the formula was it worked great at sucking in a specific sort of person

[–] brucethemoose@lemmy.world 5 points 17 hours ago* (last edited 16 hours ago)

What’s incredible is Facebook is not liable for that at all.

What if… I dunno, a giant school peddled that same info? Or some religious figure got a ton of people killed? There’s really not a good metaphor for Facebook, which is why folks don’t really know of the sheer influence they command, yet are still treated like a garage startup operating a fair forum that needs legal protection.

[–] shawn1122@sh.itjust.works 5 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Absolutely agree. The "internet" was not a harmful worldview reinforcing machine back when we were told not to cite GeoCities in our book reports.

Asking people to betray their dopamine is a monumental task. It's like like challenging any other addiction.

[–] Taalnazi@lemmy.world 4 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Best way to change that is to shut down algorithms that have that bias, and mandate media literacy.

[–] brucethemoose@lemmy.world 9 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

That doesn’t work because people like the algorithms, unfortunately. They win the attention war, and Trump is perfectly emblematic of this.

It’s also not even about ‘political bias’. Toxicity is the natural end state.

[–] Taalnazi@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago

Some countries do take action. Mine does, by banning that.