this post was submitted on 01 Oct 2025
47 points (100.0% liked)
technology
24029 readers
222 users here now
On the road to fully automated luxury gay space communism.
Spreading Linux propaganda since 2020
- Ways to run Microsoft/Adobe and more on Linux
- The Ultimate FOSS Guide For Android
- Great libre software on Windows
- Hey you, the lib still using Chrome. Read this post!
Rules:
- 1. Obviously abide by the sitewide code of conduct. Bigotry will be met with an immediate ban
- 2. This community is about technology. Offtopic is permitted as long as it is kept in the comment sections
- 3. Although this is not /c/libre, FOSS related posting is tolerated, and even welcome in the case of effort posts
- 4. We believe technology should be liberating. As such, avoid promoting proprietary and/or bourgeois technology
- 5. Explanatory posts to correct the potential mistakes a comrade made in a post of their own are allowed, as long as they remain respectful
- 6. No crypto (Bitcoin, NFT, etc.) speculation, unless it is purely informative and not too cringe
- 7. Absolutely no tech bro shit. If you have a good opinion of Silicon Valley billionaires please manifest yourself so we can ban you.
founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
300*1G = 1,500G
Anyone good at math, can you help me balance my equation?
All jokes aside, I'm fairly sure the 1500G is its design load, meaning the structures are strong enough to withstand those forces and loads, but the centrifuge only rotates such that the materials within the container experience a max of 300G.
A 5x Safety Factor is pretty intense, but I'm guessing that these aren't as directly related as the article makes it sound. Maybe like the forces on the arm towards the center need to withstand forces equivalent to 1,500G in order for the container to experience 300G accelerations.
I'm guessing it's one part lost in translation and one part journalists not being very good at reporting technical details in general
Definitely, scientific articles like these are more fun to read without thinking too deeply, because science communication (as a system, not angry at Scientists or whatever) is actually kinda shit when you start thinking about the information deeper than surface level
I can imagine a scientist explaining how this machine works in enthusiastic detail to some journalist who nodded along and then wrote down that the machine does 300G and also 1500G.
Maybe it can do 300G with a 20t payload or 1500G with a 4t payload?
Definitely a logical conclusion. F=ma is really hard for some to understand lol