this post was submitted on 30 Sep 2025
603 points (99.3% liked)
Not The Onion
18249 readers
2206 users here now
Welcome
We're not The Onion! Not affiliated with them in any way! Not operated by them in any way! All the news here is real!
The Rules
Posts must be:
- Links to news stories from...
- ...credible sources, with...
- ...their original headlines, that...
- ...would make people who see the headline think, “That has got to be a story from The Onion, America’s Finest News Source.”
Please also avoid duplicates.
Comments and post content must abide by the server rules for Lemmy.world and generally abstain from trollish, bigoted, or otherwise disruptive behavior that makes this community less fun for everyone.
And that’s basically it!
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
The thing that pisses me off is that, back in the late 1970's / early 1980's, the Church became aware they had a sex abuse problem and could be held liable. And instead of mocking the priests to places where they couldn't commit harm, they:
Increased their movement of assets away from individual churches and dioceses info separate ownership, so those assets wouldn't be forfeit in case of lawsuits;
Purged a bunch of documentation about abusive priests, shredding, burning, or throwing it away;
Moved the documentation that remained to secret local archives supposedly sealed by the confessional and clerical privilege, and then away from local churches and dioceses to the Papal Nunciature (Embassy) in DC where they're covered by diplomatic immunity;
Went out and bought a massive amount of specific insurance to cover any sex abuse claims that might arise - and got a very cheap price for it, too.
Continued their practice of moving abusive priests between dioceses and parishes, denying there was a problem to anyone who might ask and giving those priests the opportunity to give other victims.
Probably other shitty stuff, but those are the points I remember offhand (and it's more than enough). They never cared about their victims, only preserving their money and power.
JPII was a pedo. I have no proof but I feel very comfortable making that assertion.
Over a thousand years of experience in legal maneuvering, they existed before the laws and watched them form over the years.
They've got the asset strategy down pat, what they've never had a handle on is their human factors - since we're all such flawed and sinful individuals, and they have a tendency to recruit from the damaged end of society to start with... denial is their weapon of choice against the Devil.
Never mind Citizens United; the fact that corporate entities (and yes, churches count) are able to do shit like this just proves that they've been out of control going way further back.
Limited liability, as a concept, is a moral hazard. It should be abolished in all but a very limited set of circumstances where it serves the public's (not the shareholders' or any other private entity's) interest.