525
Texas man accused of threatening to shoot up Pride parade to ‘pay them back for taking out Charlie Kirk’
(www.the-independent.com)
this post was submitted on 29 Sep 2025
525 points (99.1% liked)
News
32520 readers
3012 users here now
Welcome to the News community!
Rules:
1. Be civil
Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.
2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.
Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.
3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.
Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.
4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.
Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.
5. Only recent news is allowed.
Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.
6. All posts must be news articles.
No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.
7. No duplicate posts.
If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.
8. Misinformation is prohibited.
Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.
9. No link shorteners.
The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.
10. Don't copy entire article in your post body
For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
That means he is in a queer relationship, but not that he is queer. I suppose that doesn't matter to conservatives either way.
Also that info is incredibly sus and sounds fake af. The way the fbi director talks is sus, as he clearly isn't all that competent and keeps bragging about how quickly they could release info, which is not how investigations work.
The same people who provided this as “evidence” of the ICE shooters ideology.
Sure, but that certainly lowers the likelihood that he's a far-right Kirk-hater, no?
Grindr always reports a spike in usage whenever the RNC convenes. Being gay or in a queer relationship sadly doesn't mean that the person isn't far right. They might just be self-loathing.
Only if true
Obviously. But same goes for the accusations that he's far-right -- of which there doesn't really seem to be anything to go off.
I might've misunderstood? I thought you meant I had said this, or supported this claim.
But yes as far as I can tell there's not much to suggest a strong political alignment of any kind. I don't know what info we can trust that has been provided. If we take their statements at face value he was in a relationship with a trans person and found kirk hateful. He engraved memes from a video game on his bullets and shot this guy.
There were also some weird statements about his actions while running after shooting which confuse me, but it's not something I've read all that much about.
Oh then yes, we agree -- there's nothing of substance to support really any claims about his ideology whatsoever. The focus should not be on which "side" he was on regardless, but we're way past that level of rationality.
I make no claims as to why he did what he did. If he is the one that did it, I dunno.
Okay, but that's the thread we're in.
That's great. It's not a claim I've made or implied at any point. I just said a thing about being queer vs being in a queer relationship.
Okay?