this post was submitted on 26 Sep 2025
448 points (98.9% liked)

Science Memes

16881 readers
2920 users here now

Welcome to c/science_memes @ Mander.xyz!

A place for majestic STEMLORD peacocking, as well as memes about the realities of working in a lab.



Rules

  1. Don't throw mud. Behave like an intellectual and remember the human.
  2. Keep it rooted (on topic).
  3. No spam.
  4. Infographics welcome, get schooled.

This is a science community. We use the Dawkins definition of meme.



Research Committee

Other Mander Communities

Science and Research

Biology and Life Sciences

Physical Sciences

Humanities and Social Sciences

Practical and Applied Sciences

Memes

Miscellaneous

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] ns1@feddit.uk 94 points 2 days ago (1 children)

After reading I realised that this proposal isn't a single new element for all neutron stars, but a separate new entry on the table for every individual neutron star in existence, unless there are two that happen to have the exact same number of protons which is unlikely. Sounds good to me

[–] bleistift2@sopuli.xyz 25 points 2 days ago (1 children)
[–] ns1@feddit.uk 32 points 2 days ago (1 children)

we have assumed that Rex is comprised of a uniform nucleon fluid, with protons, neutrons and electrons in an idealised 1:8:1 ratio

This is how the author is estimating it, they are assuming 1/9th of the mass is protons. No idea how good that assumption is though, there is a source which doesn't look the most convincing

[–] bleistift2@sopuli.xyz 17 points 2 days ago (3 children)

Whoopsie. I used to assume neutron stars are made of neutrons. It turns out Big Astronomy lied to me.

[–] Revan343@lemmy.ca 30 points 2 days ago

Neutron stars are made of neutrons in the same way that tapwater is made of water molecules: primarily, but not entirely

[–] Natanael@infosec.pub 5 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

Neutron stars have so high pressure that MOST but not all protons decay into neutrons plus ~~electrons~~ positrons (plus neutrinos)

Edit: (see quote below)

[–] erin@piefed.blahaj.zone 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I'm not exactly well-read on particle physics, but to my understanding neutrons and neutrinos are neutrally charged and electrons are negatively charged. Why does a proton break down into net-negatively charged particles? I assume some weird quark shenanigans.

[–] Natanael@infosec.pub 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

https://abc.lbl.gov/wallchart/chapters/03/2.html

I got stuff mixed

In beta minus decay, a neutron decays into a proton, an electron, and an antineutrino: n Æ p + e - +. In beta plus decay, a proton decays into a neutron, a positron, and a neutrino: p Æ n + e+ +n. Both reactions occur because in different regions of the Chart of the Nuclides, one or the other will move the product closer to the region of stability. These particular reactions take place because conservation laws are obeyed. Electric charge conservation requires that if an electrically neutral neutron becomes a positively charged proton, an electrically negative particle (in this case, an electron) must also be produced. Similarly, conservation of lepton number requires that if a neutron (lepton number = 0) decays into a proton (lepton number = 0) and an electron (lepton number = 1), a particle with a lepton number of -1 (in this case an antineutrino) must also be produced. The leptons emitted in beta decay did not exist in the nucleus before the decay–they are created at the instant of the decay.

[–] erin@piefed.blahaj.zone 1 points 1 day ago

Thanks for the clarification! That all makes sense to me.

[–] Highlow@piefed.social -3 points 1 day ago

I thought they were made from your mom's dingleberries