this post was submitted on 21 Sep 2025
92 points (92.6% liked)

Chapotraphouse

14108 readers
928 users here now

Banned? DM Wmill to appeal.

No anti-nautilism posts. See: Eco-fascism Primer

Slop posts go in c/slop. Don't post low-hanging fruit here.

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Source

Usually, they only censor the explicit content. But this is the first time that AI tools were used to directly alter the content of the original film.

By the way, the film has been withdrawn from a wide release in China after receiving too many complaints.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] MLRL_Commie@hexbear.net 2 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Growth doesn't always translate like that to wage growth, and in fact would not if the surplus value was being used to further accelerate more growth. investment in further infrastructure, reasearch, etc, controlled by the CPC directly or through incentive structures over a private market, would not at all translate to raised wages but would raise the possible wages for all in the long term if successful.

I see the position that Chinese wages are too low to be one of priority, not of an ideological mistake. Because extreme poverty is low and 'political capital' (popularity) is comfortably high internally, it's a completely valid strategy to now translate growth to direct benefits but instead to strategic positioning for the future of the political economy, including the possibility of war with the US.

While i have your attention on the matter, something I've tried to ask before but still just do not feel I have gotten a good enough response to: why is the switch from an export economy to an internal market considered such a hurdle or barrier?

I think that this hurdle that you often bring up is expressly set at a very low priority by Chinese officials because it will be so easy to overcome relative to the much bigger ones (like US hegemony, global cooperation, resource management). Even within the framework of MMT (of which I am unconvinced except as a method of accounting with little strategic difference), this switch to an internal market can just be flipped pretty damn easily. So why should they put energy into the topic now as opposed to once the current strategy of investment in the future is going so well? What are the problems you forsee?

[–] xiaohongshu@hexbear.net 8 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Read my entire explanation here.

Why do you think wage growth is not important? Why do you think China is having a serious consumption and deflation problem…. if it has nothing to do with wage growth? People are not consuming because of the economic downturn and uncertainty. Income does not justify the spending.

[–] MLRL_Commie@hexbear.net 1 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

I think it can be said to be less important given the much larger contradictions facing China. Not that wages are just unimportant in themselves.

I agree that the problem of wage growth and an non-export economy are intermingled, of course. I just think that this is a pretty easily solvable problem and CPC under Xi Jinping is aware of that. But raising wages is in contradiction right now to competing with the US on a global stage (because, instead of increasing wages which will be used for consumer goods, extra surplus is put back into larger infrastructure and future-oriented technology and weapons). Being an export economy is still the correct strategic choice until China is no longer massively out-accelerating the US on the global stage.