this post was submitted on 17 Sep 2025
130 points (96.4% liked)

Technology

75272 readers
3927 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] KairuByte@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Reducing CO2 emissions by not doing LLM slop is apparently off the table.

Not to be argumentative, but has this ever been something the consumer market has done with an emerging “core” technology? I don’t see how this was ever realistically on the table.

AI slop is an unfortunate fact of life at this point. If it’s inevitable, we may as well make it as not terrible as possible.

[–] Cethin@lemmy.zip 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

That's what regulations are for. We've been asking for CO2 regulations for decades, but the argument is almost always "we can't reduce dirty energy production until we have enough power to replace it all without downscaling." Then they invent stuff like crypto to drain any excess power. That crashed, then AI suddenly appears to drain it. I'm convinced it's all a conspiracy to keep dirty energy companies profitable. The timing is just too convenient.

[–] KairuByte@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 1 day ago

That’s what I mean though. Convincing users to not use LLMs as a way to reduce CO2 is a fools errand. It will never work. So we should focus on something that can actually move the needle, like speeding up the move to a fully green grid.

[–] frezik@lemmy.blahaj.zone 4 points 1 day ago

Nothing inevitable about it. People aren't going to be running local models en masse; that will be about as popular as self-hosting Internet services. People are largely reliant on centralized datacenter models, and those will shut down as the bubble pops.