this post was submitted on 17 Sep 2025
592 points (98.8% liked)

Technology

75340 readers
2152 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Should OS makers, like Microsoft, be legally required to provide 15 years of security updates?

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Petter1@discuss.tchncs.de 182 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago) (4 children)

I would prefer if they force the companies to unlock root and boot-loader, when they not ship security updates anymore for a device.

[–] WhatAmLemmy@lemmy.world 87 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago) (1 children)

Fuck it. Force them from release date. There's no reason for them to dictate what you can and cannot run on the hardware you purchase. If they can't compete by providing a better OS or software, and must rely on anti-competitive models to profit, then they don't deserve to waste the planets resources.

[–] Petter1@discuss.tchncs.de 19 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Fair enough, just thought proposal above would have higher chances to get approved 😇

[–] bless@lemmy.ml 22 points 4 days ago (1 children)

You start high and negotiate down. If you start low, you'll get even less

[–] Petter1@discuss.tchncs.de 2 points 2 days ago (1 children)

😄I guess, I am bad in capitalism 🤣🙃

[–] bless@lemmy.ml 2 points 2 days ago

Nah, you're a good person. But there's lots of bad faith people out there. You have to defend yourself against them

[–] interdimensionalmeme@lemmy.ml 33 points 4 days ago

Abandonware must be open sourced, publishing a new version doesn't count as a exception.

[–] jet@hackertalks.com 16 points 3 days ago (1 children)

I'd add the hardware drivers must be open sourced at the end of support as well, and no drm, patent, reverse engineering legal protections for a out of support Device/chipset