this post was submitted on 16 Sep 2025
518 points (99.1% liked)

Privacy

41853 readers
627 users here now

A place to discuss privacy and freedom in the digital world.

Privacy has become a very important issue in modern society, with companies and governments constantly abusing their power, more and more people are waking up to the importance of digital privacy.

In this community everyone is welcome to post links and discuss topics related to privacy.

Some Rules

Related communities

much thanks to @gary_host_laptop for the logo design :)

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] lunarul@lemmy.world 34 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

No backend database needed for what they did. It was just highlighting where the faces are in a shot of the crowd, same as modern smartphone cameras do, but with a surveillance-type UI around it.

[–] trailee@sh.itjust.works 18 points 2 days ago (4 children)

Thanks, I just watched the video linked by @spizzat2@lemmy.zip and I see that now. It’s actually a little disappointing and I’d love to see the same kind of public spectacle on hard mode with real-time doxxing from a commercial backend. That would be far more provocative.

I think the article hugely understated that nuance.

[–] Cethin@lemmy.zip 3 points 1 day ago

Yeah, it should at least try to get their name. If it could include their job, income, family members, etc. that'd be great. It's pretty trivially possible. Maybe don't include address, because they could turn out poorly, but they should show how easy it is to get data on people.

[–] comfy@lemmy.ml 2 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

That would be far more provocative.

Yes, but depending on the country that could be (public + illegal) if it lists [what is legally considered] personal sensitive information or accidentally reveals someone's secret like the Coldplay incident.

It would be fascinating, but IMO unnecessary and unethical.

[–] trailee@sh.itjust.works 3 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Perfectly legal for “event security” to deploy facial recognition and watch live movement tracking annotated with real names and possibly other information purchased from a data broker, as long as it’s all done in secret. But illegal to let large numbers of people see the screen (maybe by mirroring it to the jumbotron). What a world.

[–] comfy@lemmy.ml 2 points 1 day ago

oh dont worry event security and LEA are neutral unbiased entities who can be trusted unlike the public

[–] lunarul@lemmy.world 10 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Most people don't know the difference, as made clear by the reactions of the public, comments on other social platforms, and the wording of the articles. So it's just as powerful as it was.

[–] trailee@sh.itjust.works 9 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

I will agree that it was still powerful. All of the phone videos would memorialize any real doxxing so it’s maybe just as well that they didn’t do it.

I think it would be better with minor obfuscation like F***e L***e for Firstname Lastname. Something instantly recognizable to the victims/participants but not for the entire audience.

[–] frostysauce@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago

At first I was imagining it was picking out faces from the crowd and matching them with social media pictures which it was then broadcasting to the crowd. THAT would get people's attention!