189
Hasan Piker was set to debate Charlie Kirk. Now he's warning of a "Reichstag fire moment."
(www.motherjones.com)
this post was submitted on 13 Sep 2025
189 points (94.8% liked)
United States | News & Politics
3314 readers
823 users here now
Welcome to !usa@midwest.social, where you can share and converse about the different things happening all over/about the United States.
If you’re interested in participating, please subscribe.
Rules
Be respectful and civil. No racism/bigotry/hateful speech.
No memes.
Post news related to the United States.
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
Agree to disagree, then.
I'm well aware of kirk's influence, but if anything those in his base have just been galvanized, many more have likely been driven into extremism.
Things will get worse from here before they get better.
They aren’t gonna get better sweetie. Not without our lifetime. This is the part where people read about in the future and think “wow they didn’t even know how fucked they were, and they did nothing to stop it”
I'm speaking directly as compared to him not being assassinated, friend. The harm he would have gone on to do is outshadowed by the harm that will now be done as retribution for his death.
There was always going to be violent conflict between the fascists and anti-fascists, but believe it or not he was a moderating voice in the reactionary space. Without him, the overton window shifts even further right, with voices like Shapiro becoming comparatively centrist and falling out of favor by those motivated by Kirk's death. It's a reason why the shooter potentially being a Groyper is both liberating and damning to leftists - it means that we can't as easily be blamed for the escalation (we will still, though), but it also serves as a reminder that there are more violent voices still who are driving a wedge into the center of the republican party to drive them further into Nazism.
Better to target the productive capacities of the right, rather than the beneficiaries of the right's sugar daddies (like Kirk).
I disagree. I don’t think they are actually going to DO anything. It wasn’t a lefty. People know that. It won’t gain popular support among the MAGAs. Meanwhile, as long as it’s right-on-right, who cares.
Right, because there haven't been any recent attempted or successful kidnappings or assassinations of democratic politicians recently...
Politicians aren’t people.