this post was submitted on 14 Dec 2023
342 points (87.3% liked)

Technology

59578 readers
2825 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.

Our Rules

  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
L3s@lemmy.world
L3s@fry.gs
L4s@fry.gs
L4s@lemmy.world
enu@lemmy.world
342
The salaries of Wikimedia executives are sparking an online debate about tech sector wages (www.businessinsider.com)
submitted 11 months ago by throws_lemy@lemmy.nz to c/technology@lemmy.world
103 comments fedilink hide all child comments
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] TWeaK@lemm.ee 103 points 11 months ago (2 children)

So they're making $150-300k per year, with more for severance. That is indeed relatively low compared to major tech companies.

The article's examples were Docusign (CEO made $85M) and Google (CEO made $225M).

[–] Lemminary@lemmy.world 67 points 11 months ago (2 children)

$150-300k makes sense. $225M does not. It's obscene and absurd.

[–] TonyTonyChopper@mander.xyz 32 points 11 months ago

the difference between $225M and 300k is $224.7M

[–] prole@sh.itjust.works 22 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

Hell, even low 7-figures could make sense. Though even that's still high.

But Jesus Christ with these hundreds of millions, it's obscene.

[–] QuadratureSurfer@lemmy.world -3 points 11 months ago (2 children)

It's important to note that most of what they "made" is actually just the stock that they already own or the stock options they received.

In general the actual cash that they receive is less than $500k.

Taxes are calculated differently on stock sales vs wages.

[–] nulluser@programming.dev 13 points 11 months ago (2 children)

So?

[–] QuadratureSurfer@lemmy.world 12 points 11 months ago (1 children)

The lack of people understanding this is what leads to poorly written laws.

They think that all we need is an income tax to tax the rich more.

So when laws are passed saying that they'll tax anyone making more than $1mil, people don't realize that it doesn't really do a whole lot.

[–] currycourier@lemmy.world 12 points 11 months ago

I mean I think capital gains needs to be rolled into income tax too

[–] TWeaK@lemm.ee 2 points 11 months ago

You're right that their salaries weren't $500k plus, those numbers included severance. Actual salaries were in the order of $150-300k (with the highest salaries paid to the owners).

Wikimedia doesn't have stock AFAIK.