this post was submitted on 15 Sep 2025
564 points (98.0% liked)

sh.itjust.works Main Community

8243 readers
246 users here now

Home of the sh.itjust.works instance.

Matrix

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

The mod banning these users is the same mod who made the posts they downvoted. This is mod abuse, turning the downvote button into an auto-self-ban button.

The message is "If you disagree with me, you will be banned"

Monitoring and banning users for using lemmy as intended to signal boost your opinion should be grounds to have all mod privileges removed. This behaviour undermines the integrity of the server and the wider fediverse.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Valmond@lemmy.world 7 points 2 days ago (4 children)

Maybe votes are stupid to start with, a feelgood up or down vote that does nothing for the conversation.

/Rant I remember when you typed out what you liked or disliked. Before the stupid Facebook thumbs-up. It was better before. /Rant off

[–] ech@lemmy.ca 12 points 1 day ago

Votes on sites like this are an algorithm by way of the masses, rather than what you'd find on centralized sites like yt or the like. It's how the front page gets curated to presumably interesting posts instead of being a random spew of every post made.

[–] kautau@lemmy.world 7 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Perhaps for some posts / comments. But definitely not for all of them. Votes can often be more useful than just feel good or feel bad. Very busy posts often have hundreds of comments. While certainly silly memes and the like may get upvoted there, often relevant or helpful comments do too, with unhelpful or toxic comments generally getting downvoted. Without that system in place I would have to scroll through those hundreds of comments just to find relevant or helpful info instead of not being at the top because the community provided feedback.

[–] atzanteol@sh.itjust.works 4 points 1 day ago

Yeah, I remember dozens of "me too" and "+1" comments after posts people agreed with. It was annoying.

[–] ArgumentativeMonotheist@lemmy.world 2 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

Agreed. I mean, the chans are like that: if you have something to say, you say it, you can't just e-nod/e-shake your head. And if the forum allows for it, then that should be visible to everyone.

[–] Skavau@piefed.social 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

The chans also have no quality filter because of this.

[–] ArgumentativeMonotheist@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

You don't get banned for words in most boards (all?, I haven't been there in a decade), but you can't post CP (and maybe high level gore, again, I don't recall much) and definitely can't post anything NSFW in blue boards. For me, that's enough, as I can deal with words.

[–] Skavau@piefed.social 2 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Well no I meant purely about the lack of upvotes and downvotes. Obviously yes, the Fediverse also has more rules than than 4chan too.