this post was submitted on 15 Sep 2025
1258 points (98.8% liked)

People Twitter

8190 readers
1430 users here now

People tweeting stuff. We allow tweets from anyone.

RULES:

  1. Mark NSFW content.
  2. No doxxing people.
  3. Must be a pic of the tweet or similar. No direct links to the tweet.
  4. No bullying or international politcs
  5. Be excellent to each other.
  6. Provide an archived link to the tweet (or similar) being shown if it's a major figure or a politician. Archive.is the best way.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] LiveLM@lemmy.zip 132 points 3 days ago (4 children)

I KNOW RIGHT???

And people were like "oh the killer carved UWU what's this and Helldivers 2 memes on his bullets, that's common in Groyper circles"

Bro are you talking aboutttttt, what do you mean????
I just find it absurd how these niche-in-a-niche-in-a-niche communities develop and how seemingly random bits of internet culture turn into dogwhistles inside, it reaches a point where I'm just like dude, our lizard brains can't handle the internet. We just weren't wired to work like this, there's no way

[–] QuoVadisHomines@sh.itjust.works 27 points 2 days ago (1 children)

I saw someone who described the murder as a shitpost and that scarily makes sense.

[–] LiveLM@lemmy.zip 5 points 2 days ago (1 children)

The world's first shitpost murder. Insane.

[–] HasturInYellow@lemmy.world 50 points 2 days ago (3 children)

I really, truly, with all of my being, feel that we are reaching the end limits of what the human mind is currently able to contend with. We are so overstimulated it's insane. We literally need to evolve our physical bodies as a species to continue living as we are or we will literally die.

[–] SpaceCowboy@lemmy.ca 31 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Or maybe just not go on the internet so much?

[–] SaharaMaleikuhm@feddit.org 11 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Most people are addicted. It's like you are saying "Just stop smoking cigarettes so often"

[–] Feathercrown@lemmy.world 42 points 2 days ago (3 children)

That's a more reasonable suggestion than "evolve more lungs"

exactly, hence why I will always promote research into lung alternatives that can better handle particulate matter and are easily replaceable

[–] GraniteM@lemmy.world 14 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (2 children)

With cigarettes, we recognized the harm that they did and in response developed a series of regulations about where they could be used, who could use them when, how they could be advertised, warning labels that had to be applied, and taxes on them to discourage use and offset the societal harm. As result we get this:

...and this...

The internet is a tricky one on account of it absolutely having crossover with the first amendment, but there's got to be a conversation about its effect on mental health and what if anything can be done in response.

[–] Feathercrown@lemmy.world 2 points 2 days ago

Personally I am in favor of regulating the internet but the potential censorship concerns are a serious issue with actually doing it

[–] jerkface@lemmy.ca -3 points 2 days ago

now do meat and the leading causes of human death

[–] A_norny_mousse@feddit.org 4 points 2 days ago

I'm not even sure anymore what this analogy is about but 🤣

[–] A_norny_mousse@feddit.org 22 points 2 days ago (1 children)

There is no limit. Things are really really bad? They can always get worse. Rock bottom is a flawed analogy.

[–] ICastFist@programming.dev 6 points 2 days ago

The drill is mightier than the rock

[–] QueenHawlSera@sh.itjust.works 18 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Sorry man, but it's going to get worse before it gets better.

And I have no idea if it's ever getting better

[–] Tyrq@lemmy.dbzer0.com 6 points 2 days ago (1 children)

I don't even want to bring up brain chips, there's plenty of people who already think they have them. Imagine the psychosis.

It's beautiful, isn't it?

[–] ChickenLadyLovesLife@lemmy.world 18 points 2 days ago (2 children)

seemingly random bits of internet culture turn into dogwhistles

My favorite thing is the neonazis wearing pleated khakis. Like, the only item of clothing even nerdier than that is lederhosen.

[–] QuoVadisHomines@sh.itjust.works 16 points 2 days ago (1 children)

My nephew is being sent to an evangelical school whose uniform is khakis and a choice of a red or blue polo shirt. Want to guess which color is social suicide?

Im no longer talking to that part of my family.

[–] zaphodb2002@sh.itjust.works 6 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Do they all look like they work at Target?

No, these are expensive khakis.

[–] yumpsuit@lemmy.world 3 points 2 days ago (1 children)

If this is gonna be a One Piece pirate flag kinda future, does that mean we can wear sailor slops?

[–] Sidyctism2@discuss.tchncs.de 3 points 1 day ago

We can only hope.

Pirates are in this year

[–] lka1988@sh.itjust.works 20 points 2 days ago (2 children)

I'm a grown-ass, nearly 40 year-old family man, and I fucking know what "uwu" is. These idiots think they're "exposing the conspiracy", when in reality anyone who has spent more than 4 seconds researching any meme would immediately recognize it.

[–] SkaveRat@discuss.tchncs.de 22 points 2 days ago (3 children)

It wasn't even "uwu" meme

It was the "OwO what's this?" Meme. Which makes it even weirder/funnier/messed up

[–] Corkyskog@sh.itjust.works 7 points 2 days ago (1 children)

What's the difference? ELIA5 please, I don't know if I have time to go down this rabbit hole myself.

[–] SkaveRat@discuss.tchncs.de 13 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

One is a generic emoticon, while "OwO what's this?" is an (in)famous meme from the furry fandom

https://knowyourmeme.com/memes/notices-bulge-owo-whats-this

[–] PotatoLibre@feddit.it 3 points 2 days ago

I still don't understand, but I learned one thing, when a meme seems to do not have a meaning, it's fascists crap.

Those guys always miss humor totally.

[–] lka1988@sh.itjust.works 1 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Same difference. It's used interchangeably.

[–] SkaveRat@discuss.tchncs.de 7 points 2 days ago

eh, not really.

one is more a "uwu sowwy" the other is surprised/shocked/curious expression

[–] faythofdragons@slrpnk.net 4 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (2 children)

It's this face. Like :) is a smile and xD is supposed to be somebody laughing so hard their eyes have squinted shut.

owo is the same face, but the eyes are open.

Edit: I have misread. You do understand it lmao

[–] lka1988@sh.itjust.works 4 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

I always equated "XD" with Eric Cartman 😂

Edit: I have misread. You do understand it lmao

No worries!

[–] jerkface@lemmy.ca 1 points 2 days ago

I can't even parse that as a face