Asklemmy

50407 readers

542 users here now

A loosely moderated place to ask open-ended questions

Search asklemmy 🔍

If your post meets the following criteria, it's welcome here!

Open-ended question
Not offensive: at this point, we do not have the bandwidth to moderate overtly political discussions. Assume best intent and be excellent to each other.
Not regarding using or support for Lemmy: context, see the list of support communities and tools for finding communities below
Not ad nauseam inducing: please make sure it is a question that would be new to most members
An actual topic of discussion

Looking for support?

Looking for a community?

Lemmyverse: community search
sub.rehab: maps old subreddits to fediverse options, marks official as such
!lemmy411@lemmy.ca: a community for finding communities

~Icon~ ~by~ ~@Double_A@discuss.tchncs.de~

founded 6 years ago

MODERATORS

What do you think about the concept of lesser evil? (i.e. when faced with selecting from two immoral options, the less immoral one should be chosen.) (thelemmy.club)

submitted 1 day ago by Bidah@thelemmy.club to c/asklemmy@lemmy.ml

86 comments fedilink hide all child comments

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] ArgumentativeMonotheist@lemmy.world 3 points 13 hours ago

I mean, if you truly have no other choice, what else can you do? Can it even be considered evil at that point or just "still painful"? If I have to chop off my/someone's gangrenous leg to ensure survival, is that evil or just, you know, not ideal? It's important not to get too lost in semantics...