this post was submitted on 14 Sep 2025
239 points (100.0% liked)

Chapotraphouse

14125 readers
722 users here now

Banned? DM Wmill to appeal.

No anti-nautilism posts. See: Eco-fascism Primer

Slop posts go in c/slop. Don't post low-hanging fruit here.

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Tachanka@hexbear.net 80 points 4 weeks ago* (last edited 4 weeks ago) (6 children)

when the american bourgeoisie say "political violence" they of course mean violence directed at the bourgeoisie. What about violence directed at the working class, the marginalized, the homeless? These forms of violence are "apolitical" in their opinion. The system is on autopilot and functioning as intended. Politics is only political when it ceases to do what they want. the-deserter

[–] Barabas@hexbear.net 29 points 4 weeks ago (4 children)

Advocating for murder of minorities, doing politics right. As long as they're not actively doing the killing it is all ok.

The republicans don't really give a shit either way when it comes to actively doing the killing, but the political spectrum of the US other than the 'left wing extremists' are also completely ok with it as long as you're not actively pulling the trigger.

[–] DragonBallZinn@hexbear.net 17 points 4 weeks ago (3 children)

Even on a moral standpoint. All violence is acceptable so long as it’s “not intentional”.

“Millions of poor people have their lives ruined? Buh..buh…it’s just business! Nothing personal! Sure you poor people are going to die, but my weapons are refusing to hire and working together with the rich to get the best deal possible on both high rents and having you work for as free as possible! I hurt you all the fair and square way! Nothing personal!”

[–] Tachanka@hexbear.net 6 points 4 weeks ago

Even on a moral standpoint. All violence is acceptable so long as it’s “not intentional”.

Engels commented on this in 1845

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)