this post was submitted on 13 Sep 2025
531 points (99.6% liked)

News

32224 readers
2212 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

DENVER (AP) — A teenager suspected in a shooting attack at a suburban Denver high school that left two students in critical condition appeared fascinated with previous mass shootings including Columbine and expressed neo-Nazi views online, according to experts.

Since December, Desmond Holly, 16, had been active on an online forum where users watch videos of killings and violence, mixed in with content on white supremacism and antisemitism, the Anti-Defamation League’s Center on Extremism said in a report.

Holly shot himself following Wednesday’s shooting at Evergreen High School in Jefferson County. He died of his injuries. It is still unclear how he selected his victims. The county was also the scene of the 1999 Columbine High School massacre that killed 14 people.

Holly’s TikTok accounts contained white supremacist symbols, the ADL said, and the name of his most recent account included a reference to a popular white supremacist slogan. The account was unavailable Friday. TikTok said accounts associated with Holly had been banned.

Holly’s family could not be reached. The Associated Press left a message at a telephone number associated with the house that police searched after the shooting.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] T00l_shed@lemmy.world 5 points 1 day ago (2 children)

If your only requirement for something to be socialist is the government taking over "the means of production", then the USA is also socialist, by your definition

[–] dirigibles@lemmy.world -3 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Also, it's not my definition of socialism. The American heritage dictionary - socialism: Any of various theories or systems of social organization in which the means of producing and distributing goods is owned collectively or by a centralized government that often plans and controls the economy.

[–] T00l_shed@lemmy.world 5 points 1 day ago (1 children)

The "system" of the nazis was not about "distributing" it was all about consolidating power.

[–] dirigibles@lemmy.world -5 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Yes, the goal of socialism IS all about consolidating power. That's the point. The Nazis were also in charge of distribution as well, hence all their food shortages they were suffering, just like the USSR.

[–] T00l_shed@lemmy.world 5 points 23 hours ago (1 children)

The goal of socialism is to more evenly distribute resources, not about consolidating power. The food shortages were because of a war

[–] dirigibles@lemmy.world -1 points 22 hours ago

On the food shortages - If you are referring to WWI, I could see the argument. If you are referring to WWII, not so much. WWII certainly didn't help the food situation, especially after invading Poland, but there were food issues in the country before the Nazis even took power (possibly also one of the contributing factors for why the Nazis were able to get power in the first place). One of the main topics in 1925's Mein Kampf was about seizing the farmland to the east preciously b/c of the food shortages and then the 1929 great depression hit which escalated the issue.

On the goal of socialism - I don't know man. With my rose colored glasses on, I agree with you; the intention is to create better efficiencies in production/distribution by centralizing the planning so that everyone can reap the benefits more equally. When I take those glasses off, I see the purpose as a power grab by those that position themselves near the power centers of the political organization seeking to implement those policies. This is not to say that it might not still be better than some capitalist free market laissez fairere dystopian hellscape.

[–] dirigibles@lemmy.world -2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Yes, aspects of the US government are socialist. This isn't news. The most glaring example being the Central banks and Federal reserve.

[–] T00l_shed@lemmy.world 4 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Ah so now it's aspects? No since the nazis nationalized businesses, as per you they were socialists. So is the USA

[–] dirigibles@lemmy.world -3 points 1 day ago (1 children)

That's not the gotcha you think it is. I was trying to be less provocative by saying 'aspects'. I do think the USA is socialist.

[–] T00l_shed@lemmy.world 4 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I'm not surprised that you do to be honest, you got nazi Germany wrong so you getting the USA wrong tracks

[–] dirigibles@lemmy.world -3 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (2 children)

My friend...

Water, electricity, sewage, the postal service, the FAA, the FDA, the SEC, the Federal Reserve, Social Security, Medicare, Medicaid, Unemployment Insurance, SNAP, Housing vouchers, Welfare, K-12 public education, public universities, federal loans, government subsidies, bailouts, the interstate highway system, bridges, dams, national parks, progressive taxation...

Like...which other industry would you like the government to get involved in before you entertain calling it socialist? I gather that the argument can be a provocative overstatement. However, I think you would agree that "the USA has successfully integrated many socialist inspired policies into its capitalist system" is an easily defensible position.

[–] Tiger666@lemmy.ca 5 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Confusing services with socialism. Confusing fascism with socialism. Confusing capitalism with socialism. Confused, confused, confused. Narrow minds are usually very confused.

[–] dirigibles@lemmy.world -1 points 23 hours ago

Oh hey Tiger666, good to see you again my friend. Congrats on ALMOST making an entire reply without trying to insult someone. I hope one day we can in a civil dialog 🤗

[–] T00l_shed@lemmy.world 3 points 23 hours ago (1 children)

Sure it has some social benefits it's hardly socialist.

[–] dirigibles@lemmy.world 0 points 23 hours ago (1 children)

We may need to agree to disagree on this one. I take the position that since 1913 w/ the addition of the 16th amendment the USA became socialist. Again though, I do understand why that can be viewed as an overly provocative stance. The distinction for some of these terminologies can get messy.

Out of curiosity, from your perspective, what additional policies would need to be enacted to make the USA socialist?

[–] T00l_shed@lemmy.world 5 points 23 hours ago (1 children)

Abolish the ruling class and distribute the resources of the country in a more fair fashion. Setup a proper social safety net so that Healthcare isn't tied to employment. For starters

[–] dirigibles@lemmy.world 1 points 22 hours ago (1 children)

Fuck yeah! I'm with you brother.

[–] T00l_shed@lemmy.world 2 points 18 hours ago* (last edited 6 hours ago)

Great! Nazis still weren't socialist though. And nazis are fucking horrible