this post was submitted on 13 Sep 2025
667 points (98.5% liked)

World News

49789 readers
2955 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

The next time someone tells you the youth aren’t engaged enough in politics, just point them to Nepal.

According to multiple reports, the youth of the South Asian nation managed to oust the existing government following an attempted ban of major social media platforms and took to Discord to hold an impromptu convention to elect an interim prime minister.

The organizing appears to have worked. On Friday, the military accepted the recommendation of the protest group and named Karki the interim prime minister. Karki, who accepted the role, is expected to pick a new cabinet and eventually hold elections. According to the Times, that is expected to happen within the next six months or so.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] bestagon@lemmy.world 20 points 2 days ago (1 children)

So the US should balkanize before they get better leadership

[–] LibertyLizard@slrpnk.net 16 points 2 days ago (2 children)

Unironically yes. We should still have a regional compact or something but clearly things are not working. People have wildly different visions of how the country should be run and this stupid power struggle isn’t helping anyone.

[–] ZombieMantis@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

So, like a union... Of American states... The problem is that we've already got that, but people don't participate in those local governments. They show up once every 4 years to vote for president, and get mad when that doesn't magically fix everything.

[–] LibertyLizard@slrpnk.net 0 points 19 hours ago (1 children)

If the feds didn’t have the power to control everything in society this problem would solve itself. Also there shouldn’t be a president either.

[–] ZombieMantis@lemmy.world 1 points 18 hours ago (1 children)

No, no it wouldn't. The issues are systemic, not the result of the federal government's existence. Did Britain become less corrupt after leaving the EU? No, because Britain's problems are systemic to their own politics.

It might make the fight more local, but that's already the case. You can already campaign for change in your state, but people don't do that. The average American doesn't know their local representatives, and don't engage in local poltics. You have to change that attitude, and convince people in the concept of a civil society, in which they are actively participating members.

[–] LibertyLizard@slrpnk.net 1 points 18 hours ago* (last edited 18 hours ago)

None of this relates to what I was saying. The UK already had its own sovereign government, otherwise it wouldn’t have been able to leave so easily.

I’m just saying the feds didn’t have so much power people wouldn’t pay so much attention to them and would pay more attention to their local stuff. Which would be good for democracy.

I’d like to see government focused on the neighborhood level whenever possible. Only move up to the next one if there is an unsolvable issue.

This is not the only change that’s needed so it won’t fix everything on its own but it would allow people to make much more effective decisions about their own lives instead of people in Kansas deciding things about local DC law enforcement like we do now. That’s bonkers.

[–] stickly@lemmy.world 5 points 2 days ago (2 children)

Sounds like a good idea until you have a soup of 50 sovereign states who still don't agree but are now completely wide open to international power plays and local violence. The people only have "different visions" because the rich are best served by having us divided. Caving to that pressure only makes us more vulnerable to their neo-feudal ambitions.

[–] DeathByBigSad@sh.itjust.works 6 points 2 days ago

See European Union + NATO. Kept russia from invading. And sovereignty is still maintained.

[–] LibertyLizard@slrpnk.net 1 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

That’s what the regional defense compact is for. It’s worked well enough in the past and to this day.

Regardless of the source of those differences they are real and the left has no plan to convert people. It’s time to let go and let the red states become slag heaps of that’s what they want to be.