this post was submitted on 12 Sep 2025
270 points (99.3% liked)
xkcd
13040 readers
186 users here now
A community for a webcomic of romance, sarcasm, math, and language.
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
The problem is the word "observation." Most people interpret that to mean a person look at it. This isn't the case. What it means is if it interacted with something where knowledge of its position is required. If this happens then the waveform collapses and a specific position is set. Before then it doesn't have a fixed position and the position is described as a probability distribution.
It's a good description, but the problem is you've still just outsourced the pseudo-mystical role of the observer in this explanation with that "requires knowledge" bit.
I think a lot of the difficulty in explaining these things is ultimately semantics.
Yeah, I guess knowledge is also a bad term. I guess a better way to say it is "when an interaction happens, so the position is concrete."