this post was submitted on 12 Sep 2025
46 points (91.1% liked)
Asklemmy
50385 readers
291 users here now
A loosely moderated place to ask open-ended questions
Search asklemmy ๐
If your post meets the following criteria, it's welcome here!
- Open-ended question
- Not offensive: at this point, we do not have the bandwidth to moderate overtly political discussions. Assume best intent and be excellent to each other.
- Not regarding using or support for Lemmy: context, see the list of support communities and tools for finding communities below
- Not ad nauseam inducing: please make sure it is a question that would be new to most members
- An actual topic of discussion
Looking for support?
Looking for a community?
- Lemmyverse: community search
- sub.rehab: maps old subreddits to fediverse options, marks official as such
- !lemmy411@lemmy.ca: a community for finding communities
~Icon~ ~by~ ~@Double_A@discuss.tchncs.de~
founded 6 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
Most Nazis were "regular people" until the opportunity came for them to commit atrocities.
I did not say Charlie Kirk was just a 'regular person"
Most Nazis were ~~"regular people"~~ "just right wing" until the opportunity came for them to commit atrocities.
The nazi party was far right authortarians, not just simply right wing, to say they were just right wing is disingenuous
Are you saying the Republican party and their mouthpieces are not far right authoritarians?
I know. You're excusing him but I'm telling you that even people you would consider to be better than Kirk ended up as Nazis when the opportunity arose.
Ok I appreciate the idea some political act alot more moderate then there actually beliefs like, that does happen alot when politicians stray the centrist line
I just don't think its fair to compare charlie to Himmler over the idea that Charlie could of became extremely far right wing if he gained more power