this post was submitted on 11 Sep 2025
1333 points (97.7% liked)

World News

49737 readers
4731 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Right-wing lawmakers pushed for a tribute to the U.S. conservative influencer who was shot dead.

European Parliament President Roberta Metsola on Thursday rejected a bid by right-wing factions to hold a minute of silence for slain U.S. conservative influencer Charlie Kirk.

The initiative was first proposed by Charlie Weimers, an MEP from the right-wing European Conservatives and Reformists (ECR), as a symbolic measure “to declare that our right to freedom of speech cannot be extinguished,” according to an email chain with dozens of MEPs that was seen by POLITICO.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Canconda@lemmy.ca 12 points 11 hours ago* (last edited 11 hours ago) (1 children)

That's because of people like Charlie; who take advantage of people's ignorance and good will.

His closed end debate style is designed to sedate critical thinking. Example; his response to, "how many trans shooters?" was "too many". He just plays on peoples morals and preconceptions.

The audience he retains are people who've been conditioned by the church to surrogate their faith in god with a human pastor. In this way Charlie cultivates an audience that loves trump based on what Charlie tells them about trump.

I'll never forget my sister telling me in Dec 2024, how Trumps policies would be the best thing for the USA, because Charlie kirk is "prolific in economics". Her brain literally broke when I asked her to explain why she thought that.

[–] dejected_warp_core@lemmy.world 8 points 10 hours ago (1 children)

Exactly. Prompt the other party to exercise the smallest amount of critical thought and you can watch it all unravel. It's fucking exhausting, but that's what it takes.

I once heard someone drop some nonsense in a conversation about how "San Francisco is a dirty place." Not only is "city = dirty" a common right-wing trope, but it had zero place in our conversation. It was just kinda parroted nonsense ham-fisted into our dialogue. I simply replied: "I've been to silicon valley and the touristy parts of downtown, and what I saw was a nice clean place; I can't speak for the rest of it." The guy stopped for a sec and said "well, I haven't been there myself so I guess I can't either."

[–] Canconda@lemmy.ca 7 points 10 hours ago* (last edited 10 hours ago)

Yes! We're arguing with people who literally don't form their own opinions. That's why they projects so hard that "the left is brain-washed."