this post was submitted on 12 Sep 2025
356 points (99.4% liked)

Piracy: ꜱᴀɪʟ ᴛʜᴇ ʜɪɢʜ ꜱᴇᴀꜱ

64456 readers
342 users here now

⚓ Dedicated to the discussion of digital piracy, including ethical problems and legal advancements.

Rules • Full Version

1. Posts must be related to the discussion of digital piracy

2. Don't request invites, trade, sell, or self-promote

3. Don't request or link to specific pirated titles, including DMs

4. Don't submit low-quality posts, be entitled, or harass others



Loot, Pillage, & Plunder

📜 c/Piracy Wiki (Community Edition):

🏴‍☠️ Other communities

FUCK ADOBE!

Torrenting/P2P:

Gaming:


💰 Please help cover server costs.

Ko-Fi Liberapay
Ko-fi Liberapay

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

cross-posted from: https://programming.dev/post/37289075

Comments

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] TxzK@lemmy.zip 105 points 1 week ago (4 children)

Spotty what? Can't hear you guys over the music I am blasting on my Navidrome server

[–] IllNess@infosec.pub 12 points 1 week ago (2 children)

I'm going to try this. For what ever reason I can't use music files for Jellyfin and I basically gave up on it.

[–] cyberwolfie@lemmy.ml 6 points 1 week ago (1 children)

What kind of issues are you experiencing with Jellyfin? It has worked perfectly for me, but I see the sentiment repeated many times so I guess it's not that uncommon to experience issues. I run it via Docker, mount volumes like I do with other media types, and add properly tagged music in an Artist/Album directory hierarchy. No special tweaking.

[–] dmention7@midwest.social 3 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I'm not the person you were replying to, but the only issue I ever had using Jellyfin for music was that it seemed.a little finicky about matching artist/album when pulling down metadata, and I had to do more manual intervention.

The actual streaming functionality seemed perfectly fine, but I personally settled on Navidrome for music.

[–] cyberwolfie@lemmy.ml 2 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Do you run the files through something like MusicBrainz Picard first? I want to uniformly tag all my music anyway, so I would do that regardless of which media server I used, but it could be doing a poor job if it does not have a MusicBrainz ID associated with it?

[–] dmention7@midwest.social 3 points 1 week ago

No, I wasn't doing any pre-processing other than "properly" formatting the track name and folder structure. So I can't really blame Jellyfin, because I know that tagging is part of the best process workflow. But I've just found Navidrome seems to be a little more hands off.

[–] almino@lemmy.eco.br 5 points 1 week ago (3 children)

Jellyfin sucks for music streaming. It is also very picky with file permissions.

[–] smiletolerantly@awful.systems 18 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

Have zero problems with Jellyfin as the Server, Symfonium as the client on mobile / music assistant for streaming to sonos at home

[–] IllNess@infosec.pub 4 points 1 week ago

Thanks for confirming. Felt like I was doing too much work to get it to not work.

[–] almino@lemmy.eco.br 0 points 1 week ago

Hey guys, I said "MUSIC STREAMING". I use Jellyfin for video streaming and I think it's the best right now. I just don't like its GUI for music. That said, Jellyfin is a great app but it has some flaws. In my opinion, music handling is the worst part of Jellyfin.

[–] thax@lemmy.dbzer0.com 5 points 1 week ago

mpd and wireguard do the trick for me, but I'm a simple man with a nice uplink.

[–] SpiceDealer@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 1 week ago

Bookmarked for future purposes. Thanks for the heads up!

[–] AlexanderTheGreat@piefed.social 3 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Does it have a phone app that also lets you search for and add new music on the go? I'm trying to get my wife off Spot but she refuses without this ability.

[–] TxzK@lemmy.zip 7 points 1 week ago

Unfortunately, no. You can't add music through any apps or the web UI. To add music, you have to add files into a folder. And due to security reasons, Navidrome accesses that folder as read-only and therefore can't write anything to it.

[–] DarkSirrush@lemmy.ca 3 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Slskd can be setup to do this.

[–] Coopr8@kbin.earth 9 points 1 week ago (1 children)

It's wild to me that Soulseek persists despite being entirely mediated by a single central server. I would have thought it would have gotten the takedown long ago.

Also the fact that it doesn't swarm, only does one to one peer sharing is kind of odd to me, but I guess it actually makes some sense in that it constrains the network to being more optimal for smaller files like music and so keeps video off of the platform for the most part.

Worth noting that the Soulseek Wikipedia page lists a bunch of clients you can use, including Seeker for Android and others for all platforms including Linux

[–] DarkSirrush@lemmy.ca 3 points 1 week ago

Yeah, there are a fair number of nice clients, slskd is just designed to fit into an existing automation flow, and can be accessed through a web browser (though of course you should always practice proper security and avoid exposing it to the web directly).

[–] AlexanderTheGreat@piefed.social 1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Never heard of it before. I'll take a look. Thanks.

[–] Mondez@lemdro.id 1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

If you are too young to have lived through the napster revolution it's very much a throwback to that kind of sharing so you get to experience p2p like it's the late 90s only with good network speeds. For an authentic experience limit your download to 56k.

Oh I remember the Napster then limewire days very well aha.