this post was submitted on 11 Sep 2025
177 points (97.3% liked)

chapotraphouse

14016 readers
1144 users here now

Banned? DM Wmill to appeal.

No anti-nautilism posts. See: Eco-fascism Primer

Slop posts go in c/slop. Don't post low-hanging fruit here.

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
 

9/11 qin-shi-huangdi-fireball

Building implosion

In the controlled demolition industry, building implosion is the strategic placing of explosive material and timing of its detonation so that a structure collapses on itself in a matter of seconds, minimizing the physical damage to its immediate surroundings. Despite its terminology, building implosion also includes the controlled demolition of other structures, like bridges, smokestacks, towers, and tunnels. This is typically done to save time and money of what would otherwise be an extensive demolition process with construction equipment, as well as to reduce construction workers exposure to infrastructure that is in severe disrepair.

Building implosion, which reduces to seconds a process which could take months or years to achieve by other methods, typically occurs in urban areas[citation needed] and often involves large landmark structures.

The actual use of the term "implosion" to refer to the destruction of a building is a misnomer. This had been stated of the destruction of 1515 Tower in West Palm Beach, Florida. "What happens is, you use explosive materials in critical structural connections to allow gravity to bring it down.

The term "implosion" was coined by my grandmother back in, I guess, the '60s. It's a more descriptive way to explain what we do than "explosion". There are a series of small explosions, but the building itself isn't erupting outward. It's actually being pulled in on top of itself. What we're really doing is removing specific support columns within the structure and then cajoling the building in one direction or another, or straight down.

  • β€ŠStacy Loizeaux, NOVA, December 1996

Building implosion techniques do not rely on the difference between internal and external pressure to collapse a structure. Instead, the goal is to induce a progressive collapse by weakening or removing critical supports; therefore, the building can no longer withstand gravity loads and will fail under its own weight

Numerous small explosives, strategically placed within the structure, are used to catalyze the collapse. Nitroglycerin, dynamite, or other explosives are used to shatter reinforced concrete supports. Linear shaped charges are used to sever steel supports. These explosives are progressively detonated on supports throughout the structure. Then, explosives on the lower floors initiate the controlled collapse.

A simple structure like a chimney can be prepared for demolition in less than a day. Larger or more complex structures can take up to six months of preparation to remove internal walls and wrap columns with fabric and fencing before firing the explosives.

reminders:

  • πŸ’š You nerds can join specific comms to see posts about all sorts of topics
  • πŸ’™ Hexbear’s algorithm prioritizes comments over upbears
  • πŸ’œ Sorting by new you nerd
  • 🐢 Join the unofficial Hexbear-adjacent Mastodon instance toots.matapacos.dog

Links To Resources (Aid and Theory):

Aid:

Theory:

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Flinch@hexbear.net 34 points 12 hours ago (7 children)

It appears that he's had a stroke. these photos are from today during a 9/11 memorial

I feel very confident saying that they AI generated that video of trump announcing charlie kirk's death, if he indeed did have a stroke

[–] hexaflexagonbear@hexbear.net 23 points 12 hours ago (2 children)

Speculation is that it isn’t actually AI generated, but they stitched together for a bunch of partially β€œgood” takes. But maybe there was some doctoring up of his face too? lol it’s wild how it’s been almost a decade since the US had a president that wasn’t clearly demented and dying

[–] FunkyStuff@hexbear.net 21 points 11 hours ago (1 children)

If I could bury my head in the sand and pretend he isn't a despicable war and financial criminal, Obama is superficially so many leaps and bounds ahead of almost the entire last century. It's almost funny how hilariously and obviously depraved all the others are, with Obama you at least have to have a bit of object permanence and know where Pakistan or Libya are on a map.

[–] Hermes@hexbear.net 3 points 9 hours ago

Yeah, I watched a video of him a while ago and he is really charismatic, especially compared to pretty much everyone else in politics.

[–] 30_to_50_Feral_PAWGs@hexbear.net 10 points 11 hours ago (5 children)

There's some weird smoothing/tweening of video frames when his suit and tie move around a couple of times that make it look like an AI video. Also the fact that his face barely moves the whole time. There are some definite cuts in there, but it's all very uncanny valley. I could see it going either way, tbh

[–] spectre@hexbear.net 4 points 9 hours ago (1 children)

I wish I could mount an argument against what's going on instead of being completely in an alternate reality from people.

[–] 30_to_50_Feral_PAWGs@hexbear.net 4 points 9 hours ago* (last edited 8 hours ago)

I guess the consensus is that they used a shitty tool (possibly AI) for framerate reduction on the footage, and that introduced some artifacts in the final video. Those artifacts are what we're picking up as looking like AI slop, coupled with the fact that half of Trump's face moves like a Hall of Presidents animatronic due to botox and the other half doesn't move at all due to a probable stroke. We're on like 15 layers of tinfoil at this point.

Maybe they used some AI tool to stitch the different takes together.

[–] into_highest_invite@lemmygrad.ml 7 points 11 hours ago (1 children)

Makes sense; I saw the TikTok video, which made the background reflections hard to spot

[–] hexaflexagonbear@hexbear.net 7 points 11 hours ago (1 children)

I think it’s edits with some sort of smoothing rather than AI, just looked at it again and it seems the way they were covering up the droopy face is by having him tilt his head to one side and squint a bit. I can see with enough takes how it would be believable. The question is why bother when he has a public appearance the next day?

That will do it. It reminded me of Flash tweening, but if someone tried to do it to cover up TikTok/MTV-style smash cuts in After Effects.

You can see the reflection of the teleprompter at the same cadence he speaks in the video, and his hand makes a lot of fine motions that AI can't mimic that well. The video was shrunk from landscape to portrait and reencoded from 24 to 60fps so there's some weirdness. It's probably not AI, but they absolutely did some editing, even if it was just minor.

[–] KnilAdlez@hexbear.net 12 points 10 hours ago

I think they genuinely had Trump try to read a script, but because of his apparent stroke it probably didn't come out very well so they stitched multiple takes and used TTS and AI lip syncing to get the final product.

[–] Sickos@hexbear.net 7 points 10 hours ago

real gerontocracy moment

[–] TerminalEncounter@hexbear.net 11 points 11 hours ago

Well... damn... that really does look like he had some right facial palsy or paralysis