this post was submitted on 11 Sep 2025
42 points (100.0% liked)

Canada

10416 readers
1267 users here now

What's going on Canada?



Related Communities


🍁 Meta


🗺️ Provinces / Territories


🏙️ Cities / Local Communities

Sorted alphabetically by city name.


🏒 SportsHockey

Football (NFL): incomplete

Football (CFL): incomplete

Baseball

Basketball

Soccer


💻 Schools / Universities

Sorted by province, then by total full-time enrolment.


💵 Finance, Shopping, Sales


🗣️ Politics


🍁 Social / Culture


Rules

  1. Keep the original title when submitting an article. You can put your own commentary in the body of the post or in the comment section.

Reminder that the rules for lemmy.ca also apply here. See the sidebar on the homepage: lemmy.ca


founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] NGram@piefed.ca 6 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Nation-building but world-ending. That's quite a shortsighted strategy to promote 3 high-pollution projects (LNG and 2 mines) and no green projects (nuclear is technically zero-emission but it's still producing dangerous waste). Even including the second wave projects there's still more environmental destruction than protection.

[–] avidamoeba@lemmy.ca 10 points 2 days ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

There's a multi-GW wind project for Atlantic Canada.

There's no escape from mining. Copper is required for almost everything electric.

[–] FireRetardant@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago (1 children)

If we want to escape mining, give up your car, electronics, and appliances. That said, we should be making a more robust recycling system and standards to make things easier to recycle, then we could in theory reduce our dependance on mining new minerals.

[–] avidamoeba@lemmy.ca 5 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

This could be a false dichotomy, not only because of recycling, but also because we could make things ..gasp.. last longer. The amount of trash we generate currently that we could recycle is the result of the system maximizing profits. But if we do as we do today, it is how you say it is. Then even if we change how we make things, we still need to build a lot of stuff to cope with climate change and that'll probably require new material.

[–] FireRetardant@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago

Getting rid of the disposable culture would help a lot, and not only making things last longer but making them possible to be repaired would go a long way too. And not possible in the sense of ship it back to the factory where they have a special screwdriver for that one bolt, we need to be repairable with reasonable tools and knowledge for most things.