this post was submitted on 10 Sep 2025
1265 points (99.3% liked)
News
32146 readers
5479 users here now
Welcome to the News community!
Rules:
1. Be civil
Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.
2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.
Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.
3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.
Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.
4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.
Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.
5. Only recent news is allowed.
Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.
6. All posts must be news articles.
No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.
7. No duplicate posts.
If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.
8. Misinformation is prohibited.
Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.
9. No link shorteners.
The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.
10. Don't copy entire article in your post body
For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
https://www.nytimes.com/live/2025/09/11/us/charlie-kirk-shooting-news
Weapon found, lots of surveillance footage recovered, including images of the shooter (not released).
ugh, these paywalls are so fucking dumb.
Do you remember how quickly the FBI released footage of Luigi shooting that CEO? Why are they not releasing any footage of this person?
You know, I'll be honest. I've always assumed he definitely shot that CEO. But, I also assumed he probably wasn't in his right state of mind when he did bc of his health issues, and definitely didn't deserve the threats of death penalty.
This:
now has me questioning if maybe he was actually just set up as a patsy the whole time.
They'll say that it's because they want to exhaust other leads before seeking the public's help in identifying by face. They claim to have "good video footage."
But probably they don't want to allow the shooter to be lionized the way Luigi was. Not releasing images now only puts that off, though, doesn't prevent it entirely.
The alleged shoot was lionized the moment Charlie Kirk died.
Since I was around 10 years old, there has always been some shooting on some campus somewhere in the U.S. on an increasingly frequent basis. I seriously cannot remember any campus shooting where a suspect just fired a single fatal shot or just walked away without getting caught.
There are established protocols that U.S. campuses have in place, not out of the kindness of their own heart, but for their own liability, that should have kept a suspect from just walking off with the crowd.
This is weird as fuck.
Their current approach has also led to them detaining the wrong person at least twice.
Have they noted anything in terms of where the bullet went? From watching footage of both angles, I didn't see an exit wound, so did it get lodged inside? Makes me wonder if the shooter took extra effort in the angle used, a hollow-point etc.
The building where the shooter is said to have been was a bit to Kirk's left - not, as was initially suggested, a different building to his right. I saw aftermath video yesterday of the area behind Kirk, behind the building his back was to. There was a taped off area there with three small traffic cones, presumably as evidence markers.
That building Kirk's back was to, the bottom of that building is wide open with a wide concrete walkway beneath it, which extends back beyond. That's where those cones were. Now I think those cones may have been marking bullet fragments that bounced off a side wall under that building and ended up on the walkway beyond/behind.
Hollow point rounds, strictly speaking, are pistol rounds. They have a cavity at the tip, which makes them balloon out and fragment more easily, to do more damage. Since they've recovered a "high powered bolt-action rifle," "hollow point" wouldn't be the right term. Some rifle rounds are made as "soft point" that does the same kind of thing that a hollow point pistol round would do, but generally speaking, you want penetration and distance with a rifle; you want that bullet to be pointy to cut through the air, go fast, go far, go straight.
Hollow point rifle rounds are absolutely a thing. I know this because I have a box of them at home. 30.06 hollow point is a common offering you can get basically anywhere.
TIL, all right then.