this post was submitted on 11 Sep 2025
154 points (100.0% liked)

Firefox

20891 readers
36 users here now

/c/firefox

A place to discuss the news and latest developments on the open-source browser Firefox.


Rules

1. Adhere to the instance rules

2. Be kind to one another

3. Communicate in a civil manner


Reporting

If you would like to bring an issue to the moderators attention, please use the "Create Report" feature on the offending comment or post and it will be reviewed as time allows.


founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] ByteMe@lemmy.world 12 points 2 days ago (1 children)
[–] racketlauncher831@lemmy.ml 8 points 2 days ago (3 children)

It's more than important. It's vital to me. I host TV series ripped from discs on my NAS through HTTP and play them back on another machine.

For years I used an extension which sends the URL to VLC for playback via HTTP. Nowadays I got rid of the extension and just drag and drop. That doesn't mark the link as clicked, though. It's hard to track the progress this way.

[–] Lemmchen@feddit.org 10 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Ever thought about using a media server like Jellyfin?

[–] Ferk@lemmy.ml 3 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

I wonder if this will help improve playback on Firefox when using Jellyfin. Maybe it will be able to play more directly and use less server resources, my NAS has relatively modest power.

[–] AtariDump@lemmy.world 1 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Plex (I know) with their native app works very well.

[–] Ferk@lemmy.ml 1 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

Oh, Jellyfin works, don't get me wrong (and it has native apps too). But I welcome every little performance gain. The NAS already starts getting noisy even when it runs just simple docker images on idle.. it can get a bit annoying.

And, from what I heard, Plex tends to have a more resource-intensive idle state due to having more cloud-based features and background tasks.

[–] 0_o7@lemmy.dbzer0.com 5 points 2 days ago (1 children)

It feels like using a browser to play video always take wayyyy more resource than a video player. Sending a link to vlc seems like an optimal option to me.

[–] racketlauncher831@lemmy.ml 1 points 2 days ago

You are not wrong. However, how did MP4 get supported in the first place? Before 2010s, the expected user behaviour was still downloading an MP4 and play with a native player. Why the big gap between MP4 support and MKV support?

[–] dwindling7373@feddit.it 2 points 2 days ago (1 children)
[–] racketlauncher831@lemmy.ml 1 points 2 days ago

Let's just say there were times I opened the browser after a long day of work just to enjoy an episode or two to prevent mental breakdown.