this post was submitted on 09 Sep 2025
163 points (100.0% liked)

news

24272 readers
1140 users here now

Welcome to c/news! Please read the Hexbear Code of Conduct and remember... we're all comrades here.

Rules:

-- PLEASE KEEP POST TITLES INFORMATIVE --

-- Overly editorialized titles, particularly if they link to opinion pieces, may get your post removed. --

-- All posts must include a link to their source. Screenshots are fine IF you include the link in the post body. --

-- If you are citing a twitter post as news please include not just the twitter.com in your links but also nitter.net (or another Nitter instance). There is also a Firefox extension that can redirect Twitter links to a Nitter instance: https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/libredirect/ or archive them as you would any other reactionary source using e.g. https://archive.today/ . Twitter screenshots still need to be sourced or they will be removed --

-- Mass tagging comm moderators across multiple posts like a broken markov chain bot will result in a comm ban--

-- Repeated consecutive posting of reactionary sources, fake news, misleading / outdated news, false alarms over ghoul deaths, and/or shitposts will result in a comm ban.--

-- Neglecting to use content warnings or NSFW when dealing with disturbing content will be removed until in compliance. Users who are consecutively reported due to failing to use content warnings or NSFW tags when commenting on or posting disturbing content will result in the user being banned. --

-- Using April 1st as an excuse to post fake headlines, like the resurrection of Kissinger while he is still fortunately dead, will result in the poster being thrown in the gamer gulag and be sentenced to play and beat trashy mobile games like 'Raid: Shadow Legends' in order to be rehabilitated back into general society. --

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Link to the polling data here

Other data of note:

Mamdani continues to go beastmode with young people, putting up regime numbers with a 73% vote share of the under 29 demographic, and a still commanding 62% of voters between the ages of 30 and 44

Amongst all candidates, a plurality of voters believe Mamdani has best addressed the Israel-Palestinian conflict

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] CleverOleg@hexbear.net 31 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (3 children)

The strongest position that can be taken against Mamdani IMO is for Adams and Silwa to drop out and they all + Trump endorse Cuomo. But even that seems highly likely to fail based on this data.

[–] CoolerOpposide@hexbear.net 29 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

Even then, it’ll never happen. Cuomo, Adams, and Sliwa are ALL egomaniacs and are too personally invested in running to drop out.

On Sliwa:Sliwa said that the only office he’s ever interested in holding is mayor of NYC, and there’s nothing Trump could offer him to make him not run, and the only way he’d stop campaigning is if he was dead and buried. Tbh Sliwa is the candidate after Mamdani that I’d say clearly loves NYC.

On Cuomo:Cuomo is Cuomo. He obviously won’t drop out and is too personally invested in this to revive his political career. He’s had a few minor endorsements and has far too much political and economic capital invested in his campaign to allow him to drop out, even if he wanted to. He has the tacit support of many establishment Dems, all invested in not seeing any ascendancy on the left, who can do basically anything but officially endorse him running against their party.

On Adams:Adams is marred in corruption and unpopularity, but hates Cuomo way more than he hates Mamdani. He actually doesn’t really seem to strongly dislike Mamdani at all. I think his political calculus is that he could try to run again next election cycle and would rather it be against Mamdani, hoping he becomes an unpopular mayor, and that would open up the democratic lane, republican lane, and center lane for him to pursue, after also not having the threat of Cuomo to run against.

On Trump’s failure:Trump’s best way to get what he wanted out of this would have genuinely been to endorse Mamdani as a poison pill. Thank god he and the people around him are too stupid to have done that. No guarantee it would’ve worked, but Trump already can’t run for reelection so the optics to his base don’t really matter, and it would really hurt Mamdani where his opponents needed it to: with the liberal/center-left Dems who just vote blue in NYC.

On top of all that, it’s too late for candidates to have their names removed from the ballot. That’s pretty much the kiss of death for any anti-Mamdani coalition at this point.

[–] Nakoichi@hexbear.net 1 points 1 day ago (3 children)

Trump can, in fact run again because his first two terms were not consecutive iirc.

[–] barrbaric@hexbear.net 16 points 1 day ago

Pretty sure non-consecutive terms don't matter in the US. The 22nd amendment only refers to being elected no more than twice:

No person shall be elected to the office of the President more than twice, and no person who has held the office of President, or acted as President, for more than two years of a term to which some other person was elected President shall be elected to the office of the President more than once. But this Article shall not apply to any person holding the office of President when this Article was proposed by the Congress, and shall not prevent any person who may be holding the office of President, or acting as President, during the term within which this Article becomes operative from holding the office of President or acting as President during the remainder of such term.

That said he could probably just run for a third term anyway and the courts would say it was okay.

[–] Mardoniush@hexbear.net 13 points 1 day ago

Nah. The 22nd amendment says "No person shall be elected to the office of the President more than twice".

Now if I wanted to subvert this and had control of the electoral system, I'd simply stack the electoral college so no one gets a majority, upon which the decision devolves to the house, and such a president is "chosen", not "elected"

[–] CoolerOpposide@hexbear.net 12 points 1 day ago

That’s not true. The law says you can only hold office twice, not twice in a row

[–] sewer_rat_420@hexbear.net 20 points 1 day ago (3 children)

If all those votes went 1 for 1 to Cuomo, but that is unlikely. At least a percentage of them have to hate Cuomo to much to ever vote for him, and Sliwa voters would probably rather stay home if there isn't a republican in the race.

Also, every bit of Trump tampering makes Zohran even more the anti-Trump candidate.

Not to mention Zohran's advantage in the ground game and his volunteer army.

It is Zohran's race to lose. I just hope he is still surrounding himself with socialists and normal folk and staying away from the Dem establishment as best he can.

[–] GrouchyGrouse@hexbear.net 22 points 1 day ago

and staying away from the Dem establishment as best he can.

“Here are the names of some campaign volunteers who can really help you out, kid.”

not-hillary

[–] CleverOleg@hexbear.net 13 points 1 day ago

Not to mention there is a HUGE percentage of the electorate who vote straight ticket and barely look at the names, if they do at all. Mamandi would only need a small percentage of those D voters to win.

[–] SevenSkalls@hexbear.net 2 points 1 day ago

He's already taken on some establishment people to help out his campaign I heard. It doesn't bode well, but I'll wait to see.

[–] crusa187@lemmy.ml 13 points 1 day ago

The establishment dems claim they have data showing Cuomo would win in this scenario. I expect them to try.