this post was submitted on 08 Sep 2025
519 points (99.1% liked)

Funny

11442 readers
1072 users here now

General rules:

Exceptions may be made at the discretion of the mods.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[โ€“] Rothe@piefed.social 6 points 19 hours ago (1 children)

No it was never for the rights, and it was never for the jpeg. It was for a link to a jpeg which you didn't own.

Right, I misspoke. The NFT proves you own a specific token related to the image. On that sense you "own" the image, but that doesn't confer any additional rights to use/manipulate/redistribute/etc the image that others don't have. All it does is prove that, on a given blockchain, you own that image/token of the image.