this post was submitted on 08 Sep 2025
497 points (99.8% liked)

United States | News & Politics

3283 readers
1155 users here now

Welcome to !usa@midwest.social, where you can share and converse about the different things happening all over/about the United States.

If you’re interested in participating, please subscribe.

Rules

Be respectful and civil. No racism/bigotry/hateful speech.

No memes.

Post news related to the United States.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

On Monday, the Supreme Court allowed the Trump administration to use racial profiling in its militarized immigration raids across Los Angeles, halting an injunction that had barred officers from targeting Latinos based on ethnicity. The court did not explain the reason for its shadow docket order, which appeared to split 6–3 along ideological lines. In dissent, Justice Sonia Sotomayor warned that the decision was “unconscionably irreconcilable with our nation’s constitutional guarantees,” opening the door to violent persecution of Latinos—including American citizens—by “masked agents with guns.” The majority did not respond to this extraordinary charge, perhaps because it is so obviously true.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] CubitOom@infosec.pub 47 points 21 hours ago* (last edited 21 hours ago) (3 children)

I am not a lawyer so don't take this as legal advice. However it seems to me that the Supreme Court really doesn't give a shit about the law, the Constitution, or our rights.

[–] Runaway@lemmy.zip 5 points 7 hours ago* (last edited 7 hours ago)

I mean the decision to give presidents immunity from the law made that glaringly obvious

[–] thebudman420@lemmy.world 9 points 20 hours ago

We have all been figuring that out what every constitutional right not honored shit on one after another.

[–] GreenKnight23@lemmy.world 3 points 19 hours ago

also not a lawyer, but I don't think it's required to see the vile shit that gas been packed into our government.