this post was submitted on 08 Sep 2025
92 points (98.9% liked)

UK Politics

4236 readers
193 users here now

General Discussion for politics in the UK.
Please don't post to both !uk_politics@feddit.uk and !unitedkingdom@feddit.uk .
Pick the most appropriate, and put it there.

Posts should be related to UK-centric politics, and should be either a link to a reputable news source for news, or a text post on this community.

Opinion pieces are also allowed, provided they are not misleading/misrepresented/drivel, and have proper sources.

If you think "reputable news source" needs some definition, by all means start a meta thread. (These things should be publicly discussed)

Posts should be manually submitted, not by bot. Link titles should not be editorialised.

Disappointing comments will generally be left to fester in ratio, outright horrible comments will be removed.
Message the mods if you feel something really should be removed, or if a user seems to have a pattern of awful comments.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] lmdnw@lemmy.world -5 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (2 children)

Police who uphold authoritarian system by committers of genocide deserve a blade between the ribs.

[–] TrickDacy@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

So you are suggesting murder? You first.

[–] lmdnw@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (2 children)

I’m suggesting justifiable homicide against authoritarians. One man’s terrorist is another’s freedom fighter. Killing an authoritarian pig stormtrooper is the same as killing a Nazi, slave owner, or a Russian/IDF soldier, all are morally justifiable.

[–] TrickDacy@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Ok. Like I said, you go first.

[–] lmdnw@lemmy.world -1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Can’t. Disabled. I’m the type of people that the people you defend will liquidate first after your appeasement has run its course and they don’t have to pretend anymore.

[–] TrickDacy@lemmy.world 4 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Ah yes, you're totally not a fraud. Me simply stating your keyboard warrior shit is weak means I am a fascist. Your argument is airtight.

[–] lmdnw@lemmy.world -1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

No one said YOU were a fascist, only that you give fascists cover by stating that the people need to deal peacefully with them. The UK is literally arresting and jailing people for speaking out against genocide and supporting freedom for Palestine and your solution is strong language and peaceful protest.

The only thing that stops government violence is populist violence. I’m sorry that offends your sensibilities, but I am absolutely in favor and supportive of violence being used against oppressors.

[–] TrickDacy@lemmy.world 4 points 1 day ago (1 children)

As others have said, murdering a low level police officer isn't necessarily justified or going to help a SINGLE thing.

[–] lmdnw@lemmy.world -2 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

Following that line of thinking, it would make no sense for American revolutionaries to kill British soldiers, or for Palestinians to kill IDF, or for European resistance fighters to kill Nazi soldiers. Killing low level stormtroopers “just following orders” is the same as killing an occupying soldier “just following orders.” In both instances, you have low level individuals just going along with a status quo that leads to more victimization of innocents. Police who don’t want to become targets should either fight against oppressive tactics internally, or quit and deprive the force of manpower.

[–] TrickDacy@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago (1 children)

We really don't need to argue here.

[–] lmdnw@lemmy.world -1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Whose arguing? I’m just having a spirited debate on the role violence has in balancing the power dynamic between the ruling class and the governed. I don’t believe that governments should have a monopoly on violence for achieving their goals and that the people have just as much a right, if not more, in using violence as a tool to prevent objective evils.

[–] TrickDacy@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I perceive a conversation where I'm being accused of doing something horrible as an "argument"

[–] lmdnw@lemmy.world -1 points 1 day ago

So you’re no longer defending fascists against violent retribution by the people? Do you consider agents of a fascist regime (i.e. police) to be exempt from justified violent action by anti-fascists? Should police action in furtherance of fascist policies only be faced with peaceful protest, or is it morally justifiable to not be tolerant of intolerance, up to and including violence?

[–] Hominine@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Yeah and they are calling you a shitbag coward for posting these violent fantasies on Lemmy. But go ahead and expedite the UK blocking free social media so you can mentally masturbate to killing folks.

[–] phutatorius@lemmy.zip 2 points 22 hours ago

"Everyody talkin 'bout peace. None of them are talking 'bout justice."

[–] lmdnw@lemmy.world 0 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I won’t argue that I don’t have violent fantasies. I 100% wake up every single morning and hope that I’m going to read a story about someone finally losing hope and fighting back against their oppressors.

Funny how you blame me for the UK collectively punishing its populace because of a few “bad actors” post that they think it’s morally permissible to kill fascists and authoritarian stooges. Instead of being mad at me for advocating that people fight for their freedoms, maybe you should be more angry with your government for taking them away and criminalizing opposition to genocide. Just a thought.

[–] Hominine@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

No one "blames" you for anything outside of your skull and for my part, not even most of that. What is being pointed at is the consequences of actions. Paint splashed on vehicles gave incredible justification to the UK government, what actions will the murder of an officer give rise to? What will it accomplish?
This line of thinking is nothing more than violent ideation and yeah, I fall for it as well. What I do not do is give into it, and I do not use it to justify cries for violence writ large on what is practically the only platform worth engaging in. Cooler heads may disagree.

[–] lmdnw@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Lessons not learned in blood are soon forgotten. Show me a peaceful resistance that has resulted in lasting change. The greatest movements in the power dynamic between the ruling class and the governed always require violence.

[–] Hominine@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Show me the anon internet post that has done anything whatsoever. Vomiting a wish into a keyboard for others to overcome your own cowardice is tap dancing in clown shoes.

[–] lmdnw@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

So no lone wolf attacks on fascists have ever been inspiring by online shit posting? Let’s give it some time and see what the people come up with

[–] Hominine@lemmy.world 0 points 20 hours ago

Hence the cowardice.

[–] Schal330@lemmy.world 0 points 1 day ago (1 children)

The starting salary for a police officer is around £30k, going up to £48k. Many of these people are just trying to do a job as best they can to get by, they are following orders. We can only hope most of these people will do the right thing if things become extreme.

We shouldn't condone attacking people for doing their job, that is what leads to good causes being flagged as terrorism.

[–] lmdnw@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago

“Just following orders” hasn’t been a valid defense since Nuremberg. If “following orders” was a valid defense, there would be a lot of camp guards who wouldn’t have been brought to justice after the war. All humans have agency to either victimize innocents or not. Police officers can choose to not be pigs the same way soldiers can choose to not be murderous Nazis.