this post was submitted on 07 Sep 2025
673 points (96.0% liked)
Showerthoughts
37292 readers
1538 users here now
A "Showerthought" is a simple term used to describe the thoughts that pop into your head while you're doing everyday things like taking a shower, driving, or just daydreaming. The most popular seem to be lighthearted clever little truths, hidden in daily life.
Here are some examples to inspire your own showerthoughts:
- Both “200” and “160” are 2 minutes in microwave math
- When you’re a kid, you don’t realize you’re also watching your mom and dad grow up.
- More dreams have been destroyed by alarm clocks than anything else
Rules
- All posts must be showerthoughts
- The entire showerthought must be in the title
- No politics
- If your topic is in a grey area, please phrase it to emphasize the fascinating aspects, not the dramatic aspects. You can do this by avoiding overly politicized terms such as "capitalism" and "communism". If you must make comparisons, you can say something is different without saying something is better/worse.
- A good place for politics is c/politicaldiscussion
- Posts must be original/unique
- Adhere to Lemmy's Code of Conduct and the TOS
If you made it this far, showerthoughts is accepting new mods. This community is generally tame so its not a lot of work, but having a few more mods would help reports get addressed a little sooner.
Whats it like to be a mod? Reports just show up as messages in your Lemmy inbox, and if a different mod has already addressed the report, the message goes away and you never worry about it.
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
It's not arbitrary.
And the reason it's so much worse now is the distribution.
If one family owned a company, they'd value long term brand loyalty over quarterly profits.
With a corporate board, they all own a piece that's easily sold, and a whole bunch of other people who don't have "enough" already. There's no focus on long term company health, just that the percent return increases.
That's just not sustainable.
So large corps but up companies, run them into the ground, then sell them off. Often replacing with shitty knockoff quality products under the same brand.
A private owner can be satisfied, a board will always demand the numbers go up.
Even worse is that they try to gaslight society into thinking the poors are leeches and parasites on society, while it's been them all along.
That is why I think stock ownership should be for a minimum term, like bonds.
10 year minimums. That should turn it back into an investment vehicle it was always supposed to be.
Minimum terms before sale and preventing use as collateral on loans are two very simple pieces of legislation that would make a huge difference in wealth inequality.
And loans should be taxable, with repayments being deductible.
Or we should just switch all taxation to be wealth based and not income based.
The whole system modeled on infinite growth is not sustainable. The population is aging and we’re running out of markets and increased competition abroad. We’ve hit the end of the road for the post WW2 era. The American model in almost every industry just milks and extorts the working class and they are running out. Between big pharma price gouging citizens, banks trying to deregulate, and big tech out of any innovation just making harmful advertising/surveillance capitalism. They are running out of ways to extort and keep maximizing profits without harming citizens. They are trying to seize more control and influence of the government because of this.
Look up who is allowed to invest in large corps and who is allowed to invest into start-ups and it will make sense. (Only rich investors for start-ups allowed.)
Downvote says it doesn't make sense without an explanation. By using start-ups for innovation, high profit rates are kept among rich people.