this post was submitted on 06 Sep 2025
72 points (100.0% liked)

Canada

10404 readers
473 users here now

What's going on Canada?



Related Communities


🍁 Meta


🗺️ Provinces / Territories


🏙️ Cities / Local Communities

Sorted alphabetically by city name.


🏒 SportsHockey

Football (NFL): incomplete

Football (CFL): incomplete

Baseball

Basketball

Soccer


💻 Schools / Universities

Sorted by province, then by total full-time enrolment.


💵 Finance, Shopping, Sales


🗣️ Politics


🍁 Social / Culture


Rules

  1. Keep the original title when submitting an article. You can put your own commentary in the body of the post or in the comment section.

Reminder that the rules for lemmy.ca also apply here. See the sidebar on the homepage: lemmy.ca


founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Today, as Professor Alain Deneault of the University of Moncton puts it, “The government has legalized [tax haven] use.” What was once covert has become routine. Decades of policy choices have normalized profit-shifting, leaving corporations free to route income to low-tax jurisdictions and bring it back to Canada at a steep discount, and with no fear of being challenged by the CRA.

This practice is widespread. More than three quarters of companies listed on the S&P/TSX 60 index have at least one subsidiary located in a tax haven. By exploiting the gap between Canada’s tax rates and those of their subsidiaries abroad, these firms avoided an estimated $7 billion in Canadian taxes in 2024 alone

A 2021 poll found that 92 per cent of Canadians support making it harder for corporations to exploit tax havens. This is a political no-brainer. Yet Canada’s new prime minister, Mark Carney, was formerly chair of Brookfield Asset Management, part of the Brookfield Corporation, a behemoth which maintains at least 44 subsidiaries in tax havens around the world. Despite persistent questioning on the campaign trail, Carney refused to commit to any additional measures to curb their use.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] orioler25@lemmy.ca 4 points 1 day ago

I think this is a very good example of why we cannot depend on reform. This system will never work in our interests because it is not designed to. NDP might help a bit in terms of social welfare programs that can enable more time to people who want to participate in mutual aid, but the amount of effort it'd take to get them a federal majority would be enormous and would not resolve the issue of MP and Senator capital interests.