this post was submitted on 05 Sep 2025
441 points (92.2% liked)

Technology

74900 readers
2780 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

A lot of Youtube channels are reporting declining viewership lately.

EX1: https://youtube.com/watch?v=cpVnx4_yqTo
EX2: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yF0tmhEtVJE

Fun times. Looks like a lot of channels are seeing a decline not just Linus. Hes just the latest to talk about it.

Then I saw this article as well and thought I would share.

Anyone here youtube creators? Are you seeing the same thing, a general downturn in viewership?

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Blue_Morpho@lemmy.world 5 points 1 day ago (2 children)

LTT has done bad things and never apologized. For example he copied a gamersnexus script and never acknowledged it.

[–] dev_null@lemmy.ml 2 points 17 hours ago* (last edited 17 hours ago) (1 children)

Never acknowledged it? He immediately put a pinned comment attributing Gamers Nexus when notified of it, and GN thanked him for it, which any reasonable person would take as him being happy with the resolution.

It was a piece of info from GN's video, not a copied script though.

[–] Blue_Morpho@lemmy.world 2 points 17 hours ago (1 children)
[–] dev_null@lemmy.ml 2 points 16 hours ago (1 children)

Yeah, that's what I'm basing what I said on. You can see GN thanking Linus for quick action, and being understanding that an inexperienced writer could make such a mistake.

[–] Blue_Morpho@lemmy.world 2 points 14 hours ago* (last edited 14 hours ago) (1 children)

"quick action"

3 years later and only after Linus made vague legal threats to GN about Honey requiring GN to publicize LTT's past bad behavior.

[–] dev_null@lemmy.ml 1 points 9 hours ago* (last edited 9 hours ago) (1 children)

I'm literally quoting GN, who said "quick action" in the email you can see, what can I tell you. You can disagree that it was quick action, but you are not disagreeing with me, you are disagreeing with GN.

[–] Blue_Morpho@lemmy.world 1 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

They took quick action 3 years after GN publicized LTT's past bad behavior.

[–] dev_null@lemmy.ml 1 points 4 hours ago

According to your source they replied and acknowledged the plagiarism 34 minutes after being notified by GN. I have no clue where you are getting 3 years.

[–] Rai@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 1 day ago (1 children)

And stole an item to auction off! I can’t believe people here defend their ass D:

[–] dev_null@lemmy.ml -1 points 18 hours ago* (last edited 18 hours ago) (1 children)

Which turned out to be false, and Billet Labs confirmed it was always the agreement that they were not supposed to return it, they just changed their mind later when it was already too late.

[–] Blue_Morpho@lemmy.world 1 points 17 hours ago (1 children)

The email chain was published by Billet Labs after LTT said there were no expectations of returning the prototype. It proved that Linus lied about it.

[–] dev_null@lemmy.ml -1 points 16 hours ago* (last edited 16 hours ago) (1 children)

Billet Labs explicitly said in the email that "you could keep it". They changed their mind later. So what's the lie? The emails confirm Linus's version.

[–] Blue_Morpho@lemmy.world 2 points 14 hours ago (1 children)

"..

Regarding LTT, we are simply going to state the relevant facts:

On 10th August, we were told by LTT via email that the block had been sold at auction. There was no apology.

We replied on 10th August within 30 minutes, telling LTT that this wasn't okay, and that this was a £XXXX prototype, and we asked if they planned to reimburse us at all.

We received no reply and no offer of payment until 2 hours after the Gamers Nexus video went live on 14th August, at which point Linus himself emailed us directly.

The exact monetary value of the prototype was offered as reimbursement. We have not received, nor have we asked for any other form of compensation."

Time-stamped emails were provided as proof.

[–] dev_null@lemmy.ml 1 points 8 hours ago* (last edited 8 hours ago)

All correct, and not conflicting with what I said. For the avoidance of doubt here is the email where Billet Labs confirmed they told them they could keep it: https://imgur.com/a/mF2tz4J

Then they changed their mind, and your timeline follows.