this post was submitted on 03 Sep 2025
353 points (97.8% liked)

World News

49585 readers
2714 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

In short:

A live-stream broadcast of China's military parade has captured Xi Jinping and Vladimir Putin discussing biotechnology's potential to extend life.

An interpreter translating Mr Putin can be heard saying in Mandarin that human organ transplants could let "us live younger and younger, and perhaps even achieve immortality".

Mr Xi responded that it may be possible for people to live to 150 years this century.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 12 points 2 days ago (2 children)
[–] StarMerchant938@lemmy.world 13 points 1 day ago (2 children)

More than one country can be bad. Israel is very bad. China is also very bad.

[–] sus@programming.dev 5 points 1 day ago

I was going to say there was no actual evidence, but huh, I actually fell for some of the tankie lies after enough time. China's deputy health minister Huang Jiefu repeatedly publicly acknowledged that most organ transplants came from death row inmates, and separately China was exporting organs to south korea on a massive scale prior to 2007.

(though it's notable that this has not been connected to the Uyghur situation specifically)

(Also noting that it's Israel claimed to end the practice in 2000, while China claimed to end the practice in 2015)

sources pre-emptively posted: the guardian, (old) beijing times, zhenhua.163.com, der spiegel

[–] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world -4 points 1 day ago (1 children)

It is weird to point to a country that's actively engaged in a holocaust and compare it to one that has eliminated poverty and boosted life expectancy by decades. One is slaughtering hundreds of thousands and the other is dramatically improving the lives of hundreds of millions.

[–] sus@programming.dev 5 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

You were the one that brough up the comparison in the first place.

[–] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world -3 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

I noted a real well-documented instance of organ harvesting, yes. I wasn't just farting out speculations because I hate the country's politics.

[–] StarMerchant938@lemmy.world 4 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Look let's ease of the Xi Jinping dicksucking. The CCP is an objectively oppressive regime with a terrifying human rights track record. All the tankie whataboutism in the world isn't going to change that.

[–] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world -2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

It is difficult for me to imagine what “personal liberty” is enjoyed by an unemployed person, who goes about hungry, and cannot find employment. Real liberty can exist only where exploitation has been abolished, where there is no oppression of some by others, where there is no unemployment and poverty, where a man is not haunted by the fear of being tomorrow deprived of work, of home and of bread. Only in such a society is real, and not paper, personal and every other liberty possible.

[–] T00l_shed@lemmy.world 4 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Real liberty can exist only where exploitation has been abolished, where there is no oppression of some by others, where there is no unemployment and poverty, where a man is not haunted by the fear of being tomorrow deprived of work, of home and of bread. Only in such a society is real, and not paper, personal and every other liberty possible.

Literally no where is like this

[–] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world -2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

It exists. You just won't like where you find it.

[–] T00l_shed@lemmy.world 4 points 1 day ago (2 children)
[–] StarMerchant938@lemmy.world 4 points 1 day ago

Bro fr thinks they have this in China lmao

[–] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 0 points 1 day ago (1 children)

In Eastern Europe, Russia, China, Mongolia, North Korea, and Cuba, revolutionary communism created a life for the mass of people that was far better than the wretched existence they had endured under feudal lords, military bosses, foreign colonizers, and Western capitalists. The end result was a dramatic improvement in living conditions for hundreds of millions of people on a scale never before or since witnessed in history.

~ Michael Parenti, Blackshirts and Reds: Rational Fascism and the Overthrow of Communism

[–] T00l_shed@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Right, so that is clearly written with such incredible bias. At the end of the day, people in China, Russia, north Korea etc still suffer, no place like the utopia you described exists.

[–] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 0 points 1 day ago (1 children)

people in China, Russia, north Korea etc still suffer

The sharpest spike in human misery in both Russia and N Korea followed after the Yeltsin coup of the Soviet Parliament in 1993.

This precipitated a wave of de-industrialization, mass displacement, and famine spanning the USSR. It paved the road to multiple civil wars, invasions, and genocides, not the least of which we're seeing the modern day.

Westerners will tell you that these countries were liberated with the collapse of the USSR. They'll also insist the residents of these countries are subhuman and deserve to die.

[–] T00l_shed@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Westerners will tell you that these countries were liberated with the collapse of the USSR. They'll also insist the residents of these countries are subhuman and deserve to die.

Maybe some, but certainly not most, but to say that there was no one ruling over them before yeltsin is silly, fucking Stalin was a monster, krushchev wasn't great. Mao was a horrible dictator.

[–] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

to say that there was no one ruling over them before yeltsin is silly

The Soviets self-governed for the length of the Cold War. A radical departure from Nazi occupation of the 30s/40s or the debt peonage of the interwar period.

fucking Stalin was a monster. Mao was a horrible dictator

Confederates said the same thing about William T. Sherman and Abraham Lincoln.

[–] T00l_shed@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

The Soviets self-governed for the length of the Cold War

Except for the leaders of the party? How do you define self governing?

Confederates said the same thing about William T. Sherman and Abraham Lincoln.

Sure there were some monsters in the Union army, but they were fighting slavers, so I don't really care for their opinion. Nor should you

[–] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Except for the leaders of the party?

You mean the survivors of the Holocaust and resistance movement heroes that liberated their nations from brutal occupation?

Sure there were some monsters in the Union army

Okay buddy. Glad to know where you stand

[–] T00l_shed@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago

You mean the survivors of the Holocaust and resistance movement heroes that liberated their nations from brutal occupation

Your original premise was that there was freedom without being ruled over, I was saying that was bullshit.

Okay buddy. Glad to know where you stand

Anti slavery? Yeah happy to be anti slavery haha. I'm glad to know where you stand

[–] Visstix@lemmy.world 5 points 1 day ago

So it's likely