this post was submitted on 03 Sep 2025
796 points (98.4% liked)

Science Memes

16617 readers
607 users here now

Welcome to c/science_memes @ Mander.xyz!

A place for majestic STEMLORD peacocking, as well as memes about the realities of working in a lab.



Rules

  1. Don't throw mud. Behave like an intellectual and remember the human.
  2. Keep it rooted (on topic).
  3. No spam.
  4. Infographics welcome, get schooled.

This is a science community. We use the Dawkins definition of meme.



Research Committee

Other Mander Communities

Science and Research

Biology and Life Sciences

Physical Sciences

Humanities and Social Sciences

Practical and Applied Sciences

Memes

Miscellaneous

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Droggelbecher@lemmy.world 91 points 5 days ago (3 children)

The way this is phrased makes it sound like there's a certain threshold where this starts happening. That's not right. Even a grain of dust wouldn't orbit the sun, they still orbit their common barycenter. A less misleading way of phrasing would be that Jupiter is massive enough that the barycenter of it and the sun actually lies outside the sun, which is still a cool fun fact.

[–] BillBurBaggins@lemmy.world 35 points 4 days ago (2 children)

I mean that's literally the point the image is trying to make. The last sentence says the point is outside the sun for Jupiter.

I don't think nitpicking the title achieves anything and it's not even misleading unless it's only taken in isolation.

[–] Droggelbecher@lemmy.world 5 points 4 days ago (2 children)

It says it's so massive they orbit a common point. That directly implies this only happens over a certain mass.

[–] CannonFodder@lemmy.world 6 points 4 days ago (1 children)

It says it's so massive they orbit a common point outside the sun. Smaller planets don't have their common point outside the sun.

[–] Droggelbecher@lemmy.world 1 points 4 days ago

I mean, the sentence either implies what I said before, or it implies that the barycenter is a point outside the sun. I really don't see any other reading than those two.

[–] Garric@lemmy.world 1 points 3 days ago (1 children)

That's the way I understood it at first. But after reading it again after reading the comments above, I can see the other way of viewing it. I do agree with you that how the sentence is currently written it's confusing.

[–] Droggelbecher@lemmy.world 2 points 3 days ago

Yeah pretty much my point. I know you can maybe kinda construe it into the truth if you already know about the topic, like other commenters age saying, but it's presented as educational, and does a poor job at educating with how misleadingly it is phrased.

[–] CheeseNoodle@lemmy.world 2 points 4 days ago

That's still not entierly mass dependant, the point is at a distance based on a ratio between the two masses, if Jupiter were closer to the sun then the point would be inside the sun. Its still impressively massive to pull the point outside of the sun at any functional distance but so could a grain of dust with sufficient distance and a big empty universe to prevent anything else from interupting things.

[–] bitjunkie@lemmy.world 19 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Orbiting a point within the sun is still orbiting the sun.

[–] sus@programming.dev 1 points 4 days ago (2 children)

But orbiting a point 1 meter outside the sun is not orbiting the sun?

[–] BeardedGingerWonder@feddit.uk 4 points 4 days ago

Kinda feels intuitively correct

[–] bitjunkie@lemmy.world 1 points 3 days ago

The sun isn't a perfect sphere.

[–] technocrit@lemmy.dbzer0.com 5 points 4 days ago

I was going to complain about the use of "barycenter" instead of the more commonly known "center of mass". But after some searching, I guess barycenter is more obscure because it's more specific. I'm ok with that.