this post was submitted on 03 Sep 2025
50 points (98.1% liked)
homeassistant
16085 readers
92 users here now
Home Assistant is open source home automation that puts local control and privacy first.
Powered by a worldwide community of tinkerers and DIY enthusiasts.
Home Assistant can be self-installed on ProxMox, Raspberry Pi, or even purchased pre-installed: Home Assistant: Installation
Discussion of Home-Assistant adjacent topics is absolutely fine, within reason.
If you're not sure, DM @GreatAlbatross@feddit.uk
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
Nobody but you can verify it. also others who commented implied that they control the cameras with the manufacturer's app, and that the camera has not been blocked from the internet, so selfhosting brings almost no benefits in that cadse, but definitely not any for privacy
Okay, so don't set up cameras in your house?
For everyone else: I've found on other forums that reolink can be set up without connecting to the manufacturer, and likely others. It's relatively trivial for experienced users to insulate any given device from the internet while using HA.
don't set up cameras that see public area. other than that you do what you want, but if a camera could see a neighbour's yard then they have a say too.
most IP cameras can be set up that way, yes. all you need is the camera to serve the video feed over RTSP, that's a direct connection.
but that's not everything. if you just connect it to your main network it'll connect to reolink servers without issues, and reolink can do whatever they want with it, including stealing the video feed, or if they turn greedy they can remotely upgrade your camera and disable the RTSP feed.
to prevent that, you should either create a separate VLAN for cameras, and configure your router (routing-wise) so that other networks (incl the internet) are not accessible from it. you need managed switches for that, or routers that allow you to configure VLANs.
alternatively get a dedicated dumb switch for cheap, and build a physically separate network for the cameras, and only connect the cameras and the server into it, without connecting it to the main network.
finally, what I meant with my first sentence in the last comment is that a passerby cannot verify your setup, and they shouldn't need to (or be able to) either. anybody can just claim "its self-hosted", so it does not really matter with respect to your neighbors and all the people who may pass by
I have ubiquiti cameras and doorbell at home, all stored locally and i can access them through home assistant.
and did you take measures so that ubiquiti does not access them?
I chose to enable cloud access cause my home assistant died and I wanted to continue having external access, but it was not mandatory.
I agree with your point for most providers, like ring and eufy, but I don't think it's impossible to achieve.
the question is not whether it's possible, but whether people subject the public near them to online surveillance systems. sorry, but other than being accessible from HA (which is something too) this is not better than how most people do it. at least to me it is more important than convenience to not leak strangers lives to whoever.