this post was submitted on 02 Sep 2025
364 points (98.9% liked)

Technology

74872 readers
3045 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] limerod@reddthat.com 9 points 4 days ago (2 children)

You think other companies would provide sideloading like samsung, and oneplus? They would lock the OS hard and make it difficult to even unlock. Making android more closed than before.

[–] Ghoelian@lemmy.dbzer0.com 6 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Well then why aren't they doing so now? They're already maintaining their own forks of android, should be pretty trivial to do.

[–] limerod@reddthat.com 8 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago) (1 children)

They need to maintain compatibility with play services to access apps on play store.

Also, starting with OnUI 8 bootloader unlocking is no longer supported. On OxugenOS 16 its only allowed with restrictions. The hardening is already started.

[–] WhyJiffie@sh.itjust.works 3 points 4 days ago (1 children)

allowing 3rd party app installs is not required for play services

[–] limerod@reddthat.com 3 points 3 days ago (1 children)

I never said it was. Not sure what you mean.

[–] WhyJiffie@sh.itjust.works 1 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

you said this:

They need to maintain compatibility with play services to access apps on play store.

but that does not explain why don't they already block installing 3rd party apps. they don't need to allows this to oeep access to the play store.

[–] limerod@reddthat.com 1 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Samsung blocks installing apps outside Playstore if you enable their advanced blocker mode. Xiaomi also warns and shows a pop-up for 10-30s preventing it.

Pixel's advanced protection mode does the same.

Also, when i metioned that I was talking about OEMs forking android and making it harder to use per your needs. Which would mean modifying android which could mean failing some CTS tests for play services. Boot loader unlocking is already on the verge of being killed. Installing apps and other things you currently do on your android could be next if OEMs were allowed free reign.

I received quite a few responses about apps when I wanted to Highlight the bootloader unlocking, custom ROMs, root, etc. I guess my comment was not too clear.

[–] WhyJiffie@sh.itjust.works 1 points 2 days ago

Which would mean modifying android which could mean failing some CTS tests for play services.

they are already massively modifying android, not just on the UI but the system services too, and CTS tests pass because google approved their software.

[–] Goodlucksil@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 4 days ago (1 children)

I highly doubt AOSP can't mantain itself, and that manufacturers could build from it and do whatever.

It'd probably take some sort of Linux Foundation style arrangement with manufacturers supporting a neutral team built from Google's Android division.