this post was submitted on 01 Sep 2025
297 points (97.1% liked)

memes

17393 readers
1123 users here now

Community rules

1. Be civilNo trolling, bigotry or other insulting / annoying behaviour

2. No politicsThis is non-politics community. For political memes please go to !politicalmemes@lemmy.world

3. No recent repostsCheck for reposts when posting a meme, you can only repost after 1 month

4. No botsNo bots without the express approval of the mods or the admins

5. No Spam/Ads/AI SlopNo advertisements or spam. This is an instance rule and the only way to live. We also consider AI slop to be spam in this community and is subject to removal.

A collection of some classic Lemmy memes for your enjoyment

Sister communities

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[โ€“] M137@lemmy.world 23 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (5 children)

The person who made this has no idea how big space is. It would take tens or hundreds of billions of years for Dimorphos to reach a star system, if it was a kinda close one. The Voyager 2 probe will go past the star Ross 248, which is 10.3 light years from us, in about 42,000 years with the closest distance to that of 1.7 light years, and it's going WAY faster than Dimorphos. Voyager 2 is traveling at 15.341 km/s while Dimorphos is traveling at 0.177 m/s, so Dimorphos is traveling at 0.0011% the speed of Voyager 2. If they were going the same path, it would take Dimorphos 17,437,757,800 years (17.43 billion, which is 3.64 billion years longer than the current age of the universe) to reach Ross 248.

And as said, that's if it was going to leave our solar system in the first place, which it isn't.

Just woke up so I might have made some error in the math, please correct me if I have!

[โ€“] Bimfred@lemmy.world 0 points 2 weeks ago

17cm/s seems awful low. Is that its speed relative to Didymos?

Your math ain't inherently wrong though. Without strapping a torch drive on that thing it ain't going anywhere.

load more comments (4 replies)