this post was submitted on 01 Sep 2025
123 points (100.0% liked)

Canada

10404 readers
523 users here now

What's going on Canada?



Related Communities


🍁 Meta


🗺️ Provinces / Territories


🏙️ Cities / Local Communities

Sorted alphabetically by city name.


🏒 SportsHockey

Football (NFL): incomplete

Football (CFL): incomplete

Baseball

Basketball

Soccer


💻 Schools / Universities

Sorted by province, then by total full-time enrolment.


💵 Finance, Shopping, Sales


🗣️ Politics


🍁 Social / Culture


Rules

  1. Keep the original title when submitting an article. You can put your own commentary in the body of the post or in the comment section.

Reminder that the rules for lemmy.ca also apply here. See the sidebar on the homepage: lemmy.ca


founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] TribblesBestFriend@startrek.website 5 points 1 week ago (3 children)

Makes young children easier to sexually abuse* ?

[–] MapleEngineer@lemmy.world 6 points 1 week ago

No. They want the young children to be easier to sexually abuse. They are trying to ban anything that makes young children harder to sexually abuse by teaching them about their bodies, sex, and consent.

[–] Glide@lemmy.ca 5 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

I think it is intended to convey that knowledge of these things makes young children harder to sexually abuse. For example, if young boys recognize that guys can have sexual relationships with each other, they're more inclined to question the motives of an overly nice, male stranger. The awkward phrasing makes me think the commenter just typed a little faster than he was reading and tongue(?)tied themself.

[–] MapleEngineer@lemmy.world 3 points 1 week ago

Does the addition of the word, "that" in front of, "makes young..." make my intention clearer?

[–] DerisionConsulting@lemmy.ca 2 points 1 week ago

They said the bans are trying to erase anything that makes young children harder to sexually abuse.