this post was submitted on 31 Aug 2025
354 points (99.7% liked)

Canada

10390 readers
594 users here now

What's going on Canada?



Related Communities


🍁 Meta


🗺️ Provinces / Territories


🏙️ Cities / Local Communities

Sorted alphabetically by city name.


🏒 SportsHockey

Football (NFL): incomplete

Football (CFL): incomplete

Baseball

Basketball

Soccer


💻 Schools / Universities

Sorted by province, then by total full-time enrolment.


💵 Finance, Shopping, Sales


🗣️ Politics


🍁 Social / Culture


Rules

  1. Keep the original title when submitting an article. You can put your own commentary in the body of the post or in the comment section.

Reminder that the rules for lemmy.ca also apply here. See the sidebar on the homepage: lemmy.ca


founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
 

A Burlington homeowner is fighting charges over her “naturalized garden” of native plants in her front and back yards. The city is taking Karen Barnes to Provincial Offences Court, seeking up to $400,000 in fines for violating a bylaw order to cut it down.

Barnes is challenging the case on constitutional grounds, arguing her right to freedom of expression through gardening is protected under the Charter of Rights and Freedoms.

She says her garden supports pollinators, biodiversity and wildlife, reflecting her environmental and spiritual beliefs. She appeared for a pre-trial hearing on Wednesday and is scheduled for a two-day trial in November, according to her lawyer, Vilko Zbogar.

Zbogar says the case is about more than the fine. “Courts have recognized since at least 1996 that freedom of expression under the Charter protects natural gardens as expressions of profound environmental values,” he said. “For Karen, it’s also a spiritual exercise — tied to her creed and beliefs. This falls under Sections 2(a) and 2(b) of the Charter: freedom of conscience and religion and freedom of expression.”

Experts say naturalized gardens and meadows can attract far more pollinators than regularly mown lawns, while also using less water and improving soil health.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Binzy_Boi@piefed.ca 13 points 4 days ago (2 children)

I think the term is fine if you approach it from an "invasive species" mindset rather than an "undesirable" mindset.

I don't know if it was intentionally done by my teachers, but that's the impression I always got about the term since it was usually brought up in the context of introduced species of plants causing harm to native species. Stuff like dandelions and such.

[–] Wolf@lemmy.today 6 points 3 days ago

I understand what you are saying, but growing up the term 'weed' was always used in the 'undesirable plants' sense and the term 'invasive species' is more accurate when you are discussing them specifically. When I first started gardening, the guy who trained me defined weeds as 'any plant the client doesn't want growing on their property'.

Stuff like dandelions and such.

Dandelions are a complex topic. While some consider them "Noxious Weeds", other people recognize their value as important sources of food for insects, they attract pollinators, and they also release ethylene which is a gas that encourages fruit setting and fruit ripening, so they are sometimes grown as 'companion plants'.

Dandelions are only weeds if you don't want them there, like any other 'weed'.

[–] DeathsEmbrace@lemmy.world 1 points 3 days ago

This is the real problem. Where the fuck did you find a plant only native in South America?