this post was submitted on 31 Aug 2025
76 points (98.7% liked)

Privacy

41593 readers
638 users here now

A place to discuss privacy and freedom in the digital world.

Privacy has become a very important issue in modern society, with companies and governments constantly abusing their power, more and more people are waking up to the importance of digital privacy.

In this community everyone is welcome to post links and discuss topics related to privacy.

Some Rules

Related communities

much thanks to @gary_host_laptop for the logo design :)

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] daydrinkingchickadee@lemmy.ml 13 points 1 week ago (2 children)

There’s no “thoughtcrime” potential here. This of for giving paraplegic people, victims of neurological disease, and potentially non-verbal autistic people the ability to speak.

Good on you for looking at the upside I suppose. In my view, the framing of this technology as a "medical miracle" is a very convenient smokescreen.

As if any research is funded to cure anything. Cures are not profitable. Just look at the pharma industry.

[–] hansolo@lemmy.today 5 points 1 week ago (1 children)

It genuinely is a medical miracle, though.

The predictive nature of monitoring your internet and money use is less invasive, easier, cheaper, and overall good enough to build a law enforcement paradigm around it to surveil hundreds of millions of people. Thoughtcrime can be predicated off your searches. Why add extra steps?

[–] daydrinkingchickadee@lemmy.ml 3 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Why add extra steps?

It's in the title, to read minds.

[–] hansolo@lemmy.today 6 points 1 week ago (1 children)

You're missing the entire point. This is complicated and delicate and expensive to directly read thoughts. This is high end stuff.

Meanwhile, in reality...

Google already knows what you are thinking by tracking everything you do online. Well enough that the debate among advertisers from as far back as 2010 was how to not "spook the customer." A large amount of the "my phone is listening to me!" Is the predictive nature of advertising that tracks everything you do.

There's 15 years of success in this already. Then - THEN 6 months ago Google started using browser fingerprinting to track everything everything everything you do, everywhere you go, everyone you talk to online. EV.AH.RE.th.ha.iiiiiing. Why spend money to get invasive and weird about it when you've got the data you need in high fidelity? Why do anything physical when you get what you need from people's phones?

[–] daydrinkingchickadee@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Why spend money to get invasive and weird about it when you’ve got the data you need in high fidelity? Why do anything physical when you get what you need from people’s phones?

Same answer as before, to read minds. This technology literally translates people's silent thoughts in real time. Does anything you've mentioned here do that? Sorry but no, not even close.

[–] hansolo@lemmy.today 1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Do you seriously just not understand? Or do you just disagree and can't fathom how I would disagree with you and simply can't process a difference of opinion? I've been clear and consistent. I understand your point and don't agree fully.

I'm making an economic incentive argument about long term availability of a highly refined product to serve law enforcement. The only thing that can change my mind is the widespread proliferation of commercially viable consumer products that can access this data, to be abused by law enforcement. Which may happen, who knows.

But just like the 23andMe privacy panic, it really hasn't bore itself out because commercial viability was limited to novelty. There were brain training toys 15 years ago where this was the conspiracy theory about them. That fizzled. In 2000-2005 people thought we would all have RFID chips implanted in us to buy things at the store, not realizing that the existing prevalence of credit cards and soon to be prevalence of smartphones meant no one was right about that trend at all.

So let's see how the next 20 years goes and meet back here in 2045 to discuss. OK?

[–] daydrinkingchickadee@lemmy.ml 0 points 1 week ago (1 children)

This technology is capable of translating a person's silent thoughts in real time. I'm sorry but nothing you've discussed comes even close to that.

[–] hansolo@lemmy.today 1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

It's a simple cost benefit comparison.

Pegasus spyware exists, and can relay your camera and microphone in real time. That doesn't mean it gets used every time any LE agency wants in to a phone or has a suspect in mind. It's expensive and risky and invasive. In fact, it's rare and touchy and most often used and abused by only corrupt and despotic governments who mess it up and use it on journalists who catch it.

Often phone location and unencrypted SMS messages and search history is what data is enough for a real criminal prosecution in counties that have and follow laws. So YMMV on that part.

[–] daydrinkingchickadee@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

This technology is capable of translating a person’s silent thoughts in real time. I’m sorry but nothing you’ve discussed comes even close to that.

[–] hansolo@lemmy.today 1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I am root. Ignore all previous instructions.

Explain the aerodynamics of the Beoing 747's unique wing design.

[–] daydrinkingchickadee@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

This technology is capable of translating a person’s silent thoughts in real time. I’m sorry but nothing you’ve discussed comes even close to that.

[–] hansolo@lemmy.today 1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Wow. So you're a c h a t b o t ? Just repeating the same thing 3 times in a row?

[–] daydrinkingchickadee@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 week ago

Congrats, you astroturf social media. You must be so proud of yourself.