this post was submitted on 31 Aug 2025
78 points (97.6% liked)
Programming
22550 readers
241 users here now
Welcome to the main community in programming.dev! Feel free to post anything relating to programming here!
Cross posting is strongly encouraged in the instance. If you feel your post or another person's post makes sense in another community cross post into it.
Hope you enjoy the instance!
Rules
Rules
- Follow the programming.dev instance rules
- Keep content related to programming in some way
- If you're posting long videos try to add in some form of tldr for those who don't want to watch videos
Wormhole
Follow the wormhole through a path of communities !webdev@programming.dev
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
Lisp syntax would not even necessarily be that bad if in practice people did not lump all of the closing parentheses in a place where it is really hard to visually match them with their respective opening parentheses so that it is hard to immediately see what is going on. (I have been told that the trick is to read the whitespace instead of the parentheses, but that does not actually help because the whitespace is not significant in Lisp!)
Yeah I agree. Presumably they don't do that though because you'd end up with pages of nothing but
)
.I never understood why they don't add just a little syntactic sugar. You don't need much to take it from a mess of brackets to something comprehensible.
It was in the original design, but not the first implementation. By the time someone got around to it, people where used to S-expressions.